RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
"Ping Pan" <ppan@hammerheadsystems.com> Tue, 04 April 2006 15:49 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQnmg-0007oH-6u; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:49:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQnme-0007oC-Qm for l2CP@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:49:32 -0400
Received: from mail.hammerheadsystems.com ([65.113.43.2]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQnmd-0004Hk-EP for l2CP@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 11:49:32 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:49:30 -0700
Message-ID: <2DAC9E7A4640234B85975565E5D83AE1017670ED@srvcaexg01.headquarters.hammerheadsystems.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
Thread-Index: AcZX8j5beQCvQMchRnqeEsZgdNFfGQADQttw
From: Ping Pan <ppan@hammerheadsystems.com>
To: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc: l2CP@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: l2cp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Control Protocol Discussion List <l2cp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp>, <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/l2cp>
List-Post: <mailto:l2cp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp>, <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: l2cp-bounces@ietf.org
ANCP is fine. Thanks! - Ping -----Original Message----- From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:andymalis@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:15 AM To: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk Cc: l2CP@ietf.org Subject: Re: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Matthew, I prefer ANCP. Thanks, Andy At 4/4/2006 12:53 +0100, Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk wrote: >All, > >We've had a fairly lengthy discussion on the potential names for the >working group. > >There seems to be a reasonable number of people in favour of either >BAMP or GAMP. However, there also seem to be a reasonable number of >people who would not like to see 'management' in the WG name, as it >would more accurately be described as a control protocol. > >Of the other names, there were few that included control, did not clash >with other acronyms, and did not say "layer 2 control" (which was one >of the problems with L2CP). > >In an attempt to come to a conclusion on this, please can you indicate >your preference between the following: > >ANCO (Access Node Control) > >ANCP (Access Node Control Protocol) > >Thanks, >Matthew _______________________________________________ L2cp mailing list L2cp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp _______________________________________________ L2cp mailing list L2cp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp
- [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Matthew.Bocci
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Jerome Moisand
- Re: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Andrew G. Malis
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Peter Arberg
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Kim Hyldgaard (ST/LMD)
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Shah, Himanshu
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Sanjay Wadhwa
- Re: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Sven.Ooghe
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Maglione Roberta
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Invernizzi Fabrizio
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Ping Pan
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Sandy Ng (swkeng)
- RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time Schott, Roland