RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time

"Sandy Ng \(swkeng\)" <swkeng@cisco.com> Tue, 04 April 2006 16:25 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQoLN-0005ak-FI; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 12:25:25 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQoLL-0005af-O6 for l2CP@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 12:25:23 -0400
Received: from test-iport-3.cisco.com ([171.71.176.78]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FQoLK-0005nS-92 for l2CP@ietf.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2006 12:25:23 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by test-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2006 09:25:21 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k34GPFHP026742; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:25:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.176]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:25:20 -0700
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 09:25:15 -0700
Message-ID: <813F12598722004A9F0A3593D83F7A040177B4B8@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
Thread-Index: AcZX3m+TzRt7XsjqSNmCTsW2BE+PJQAJdYkg
From: "Sandy Ng (swkeng)" <swkeng@cisco.com>
To: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk, l2CP@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Apr 2006 16:25:20.0545 (UTC) FILETIME=[5DEB4110:01C65804]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52f7a77164458f8c7b36b66787c853da
Cc:
X-BeenThere: l2cp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Control Protocol Discussion List <l2cp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp>, <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/l2cp>
List-Post: <mailto:l2cp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp>, <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: l2cp-bounces@ietf.org

ANCP works.

-Sandy
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk 
> [mailto:Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk] 
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:53 AM
> To: l2CP@ietf.org
> Subject: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
> 
> All,
> 
> We've had a fairly lengthy discussion on the potential names 
> for the working group.
> 
> There seems to be a reasonable number of people in favour of 
> either BAMP or GAMP. However, there also seem to be a 
> reasonable number of people who would not like to see 
> 'management' in the WG name, as it would more accurately be 
> described as a control protocol.
> 
> Of the other names, there were few that included control, did 
> not clash with other acronyms, and did not say "layer 2 
> control" (which was one of the problems with L2CP).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In an attempt to come to a conclusion on this, please can you 
> indicate your preference between the following:
> 
> 
> ANCO (Access Node Control)
> 
> 
> ANCP (Access Node Control Protocol)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Matthew
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> L2cp mailing list
> L2cp@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp
> 

_______________________________________________
L2cp mailing list
L2cp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp