RE: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time

I prefer ANCP (although ANCO works too)..To accomodate Jerome's point
though, we might want to consider DANCO (dynamic access node control) 

-Sanjay

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk [mailto:Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:53 AM
>To: l2CP@ietf.org
>Subject: [L2CP] Working group name: decision time
>
>
>All,
>
>We've had a fairly lengthy discussion on the potential names for the
>working group.
>
>There seems to be a reasonable number of people in favour of 
>either BAMP or
>GAMP. However, there also seem to be a reasonable number of people who
>would not like to see 'management' in the WG name, as it would more
>accurately be described as a control protocol.
>
>Of the other names, there were few that included control, did not clash
>with other acronyms, and did not say "layer 2 control" (which 
>was one of
>the problems with L2CP).
>
>
>
>
>
>In an attempt to come to a conclusion on this, please can you 
>indicate your
>preference between the following:
>
>
>ANCO (Access Node Control)
>
>
>ANCP (Access Node Control Protocol)
>
>
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>Matthew
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>L2cp mailing list
>L2cp@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp
>

_______________________________________________
L2cp mailing list
L2cp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp