IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC

Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com> Thu, 20 October 2022 00:42 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F759C15257E for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.125
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sobco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IJT_vCYt5VGZ for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (173-166-5-71-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.5.71]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD89C15257D for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9522AB339BA; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 20:41:56 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=sobco.com; s=mail; t=1666226516; bh=YmKgrZayRxDyYq6SI4roYAR6AFg=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=cWcv0TWgrYwti574COg//VTs3QN5MED/SyAS62eD03TiC0XabkQ0z2k1onTA7KEO7 FQSOb5KkevIUpOb/htdwd2WeJZP6OQHzsUY3EWel+a3WFNxNCyXb8EPCTGi9WUnTXI 1xt+5kceBqnWpBK6egfh3hb1JV0G4x/lIvy3XXZVSUR4ZMZ4O8Ys739ppCXi0JfbZH lIpMQMl8mvb3pdECIGRgGSSRAMO9xK3w1a16gsn/r6QralTSQpGjTi0Pc93Uu88TG5 MoZaZQfw9YGboGqfxFecDtOmR5RWKG4rKI+RcvpAOUIOU2pZjg4W09DBXzEiTNrPAv aZIxQQ+1geRmw==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn3sxCmZJkagN9-fzPa_c1ssW0yGofXXEROKz3q4JtzLyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 20:41:56 -0400
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <67E40CFF-2AE7-484F-86F7-A617A9EC564B@sobco.com>
References: <166621075802.44847.14382611991776479938@ietfa.amsl.com> <371922.1666215280@dyas> <Y1B7IPGPfzDcDDxE@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <295948c3-b116-365f-a682-6e286be69ffb@gmail.com> <Y1CCh1XOwkNFafet@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAKr6gn127iGBjtB2+Q=80Tydfp8gnU0NOsFskU96D8digL6bUQ@mail.gmail.com> <9BF773D1-DFD2-457E-8E71-5126CCB81FF4@sobco.com> <CAKr6gn3sxCmZJkagN9-fzPa_c1ssW0yGofXXEROKz3q4JtzLyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/KuJW4f3-WhCiyoIrPvelXUOJwBk>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:42:02 -0000


> On Oct 19, 2022, at 8:38 PM, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:
> 
> So the problem as you state it (if I understand this right) is that
> all this draft does, is disclaim subdomains for use by IETF and
> related bodies, it seeks to make no other alteration to the delegation
> of authority of the domain, or disclaim registrar functions for the
> domain.

well, I did not say that 

I said that I could see that the IETF had the authority to ask that the subdomains that were created by IETF action 
be removed

I made no claim as to what this draft does or does not do

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email