IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Wed, 19 October 2022 23:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81315C15257D for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVAPQDLgI3zP for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92748C152578 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id g7so25590014lfv.5 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nRuxrZmzbGA8ygQKoj69Q3wI8lnLJf2KctnWj5O6t5Y=; b=uWqAGu2KksaZNDIgqsPKKBS6lf1YeKmabEdWb+q81+VT7GgLmnS6zKt4Z+ocVJHNPR oZiW5R2nfiocRMQ/wJd7T7Ub85jo6J3Mac5Dq3mS23EdR5588sOyYxhb7YNdEEH+OIGF G6wi7CLGmNMcNA2uVljASv5kJHxIgQLSpckcvmTO8YXtZ9+roMSWjofbohmPruHwPdZb Y8cUtD5QVV3EZ8P/IHp5l4sRRI7ng+oWJ+kXy7ARhFUT9yX8aiPkoJQmpvcJpkiKaNVM mvuQNjjkLsZ5IK3YEJxH9KGohpU7G0O+uNNaHt3IZolSUsh5tM0obXVDe2y9WNCa3Qe6 jsXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nRuxrZmzbGA8ygQKoj69Q3wI8lnLJf2KctnWj5O6t5Y=; b=gE1/6dp0jSSBSlY7JIe/yQiaIgu0xDHZHfNrjrJHLZnW1kluUmJhVD/8FwDPPKqWrU zy+2lZ2EQUuqNz/zZYQlpZ69aZ7qzOckoss5gp/iDiV4r1Nv+JFkYkt6GNkclwIvh72y xHNjYeJaImL720GK6ul6RISF+t2WZnZgjI60j/BTrxotVKcFfKoBAPxac6H3dEElejz4 2OF2DqZ4TTGEduMox0hUkRYqpBijlYk9FJ6Z893g/F0s6OYi75zBgSohaNGpxsMAv/41 6AQpg6DofszNB6yEnUhgea3+my7WEu8Xn7Vgr9NLIsjdplP2nV4VJT9+aBxCYDCoh3xK POKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1UgQuvlnsSQVYb5+plSerUZdYiJ5JapndX5UVtf/AVySR4edUn SbpDNjEv2HZ3nndZjhnxPWyaRJoKPUGkxMzuUPaOzA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM63BOapwjc2zFYXYcBb+5NwkO+Nk7M2BhkblqUItq9+PXLcU7PxzgapY8R8cd9GD3N4y+B1btgK1F0RUEdo6TA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:5d5:b0:4a2:3a71:16f7 with SMTP id o21-20020a05651205d500b004a23a7116f7mr4020299lfo.168.1666221793590; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166621075802.44847.14382611991776479938@ietfa.amsl.com> <371922.1666215280@dyas> <Y1B7IPGPfzDcDDxE@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <295948c3-b116-365f-a682-6e286be69ffb@gmail.com> <Y1CCh1XOwkNFafet@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <Y1CCh1XOwkNFafet@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:23:01 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn127iGBjtB2+Q=80Tydfp8gnU0NOsFskU96D8digL6bUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ZG_9ojkJxZ8piLnRgkMBH91yT_U>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:23:18 -0000

I agree with what I thik Toerless is saying here.

1) the wording in the draft appears to (re)open the door to use of the
domain. This is despite the intent of the draft and I believe the
organisation, to remove dependency and use of the domain. Why is this
wording being used?

2) why does IANA continue to "operate" the domain, if there is no
dependency and no forseen use? The proper way to get shot of a burden,
is to give it to somebody else. Re-delegate to ICANN and make them
responsible for the registrar decisions about what treaty bodies are
allowed to have state in .INT

Toerless? Is that a reasonably good take on what you said? It's what I
think you said.

-G

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email