IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Thu, 20 October 2022 04:53 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D635C1524C7 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v97O5lawR9kj for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-p8.oit.umn.edu (mta-p8.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D36FEC1524BA for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p8.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MtFbL4lWFz9vBs7 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:53:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p8.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p8.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id splYKuTPupWj for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:53:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p8.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MtFbL1dyyz9vBs6 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:53:02 -0500 (CDT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mta-p8.oit.umn.edu 4MtFbL1dyyz9vBs6
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mta-p8.oit.umn.edu 4MtFbL1dyyz9vBs6
Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id b8-20020a056402278800b0045d410dec69so11306415ede.2 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gzyb4vgYowPyq0OFH/qiyykQhb3EFVoXnpqpRQ6Fym8=; b=QGbGW0NjwRdYJNK8soIVdj5bv9IEkrdZXPyEH3rOEPvQQVnRAs6CLKdidGLW7YNk/f vSBiPpEN5ys90DRyWxEmc1JXccaQjZ0GGXPwcZ2iHlEU49gT6vrbFcprXm+XjkrXVVyl kfxy1WxPSOk4+yn9DI+EsNKw/+YuSgz+kvOJdyEofV+G+5CMk9eeyLVUiIQ9MQL9NHiH xPhwDMYnOiFy0bgw7+MKeqkKMAxc25yv/9oV4I2fDSIgaQd4JDi7eI+NHE8G25BbBEOq +BpOnkt9ooUWip2I/vZGxCBerDbgMMNuiRDSB0zBwHdnLU2s2CEhwGcLGLRWQ2N1EZ5J QJGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=gzyb4vgYowPyq0OFH/qiyykQhb3EFVoXnpqpRQ6Fym8=; b=nVPqQPkscJBivdvTRmpBNs6HYvhwl+vLvY+mp9pIb0yEp4OzwcFH77U3Mh1teAYHOY CdzFKRfJgLR9GEtg4TPN9jsn4BQeBQO6F+M6gX8Xa2ki3oB4zlO+hHZsBwoCAM4wJkbV TVsKHa8hK0PPU3bfIfavn0QTYdE2v2xAVhNpcumxM7TvAhxiujeNHV/qBbraU/cH8oEg H+xsowl6279s0A9GDtwpfkzs1pC78w2VoceQx4GUQ2+Ma9T8pFTZLJ43JJTuaC5hytw0 AWMS0loBiHDzsozKM2WJy9xfIRqp05nCZaZSDyyfbTUtR4NU2hmfRQt66H5/gCM/C+b9 IQAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf193OnCQd9Pu6XXMrrj751XdvQUZZte6l2/9PFuEOvJBwvGSo2n yDFF1tLRxwSiNwuo2xrT5liT9VNaFFjVsOpPzdcmVu1uhl3SfGWw+IO9GUpulws2AevD2B873Lh bNh8AvBwQO903PZ4FW1ahsNrlXRNPjKI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e0f:b0:791:9529:3674 with SMTP id hp15-20020a1709073e0f00b0079195293674mr9250847ejc.503.1666241580313; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5H+yCoYkWJKT/+S0TWFXqD8rhMHnNp6YH6bkVoSPWp/jGQLAbAnqCVoxR0Er5YYYBal02SHzc1Il0IhVJv4iU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e0f:b0:791:9529:3674 with SMTP id hp15-20020a1709073e0f00b0079195293674mr9250831ejc.503.1666241579942; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166621075802.44847.14382611991776479938@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <166621075802.44847.14382611991776479938@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:52:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau0ioULBv40NjxgUpFMb0GEnL2wess=iq1h0ziUxU4qo8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org
Cc: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>, draft-davies-int-historic@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007ba6ac05eb70190d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/iMODKhaCcUs02TZlEK2QqfTEWs8>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:53:08 -0000

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 3:19 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:

> Abstract
>
>
>    The document marks as historic any "int" domain names that were
>    designated for infrastructure purposes, and identifies them for
>    removal from the "int" top-level domain.  Any implementation that
>    involves these domains should be considered deprecated.  This
>    document also marks RFC 1528 and RFC 1706 as historic..
>

I'm interested in the rationale for RFC 1528 being marked as historic and
not also RFC 1529, RFC 1530, and RFC 1703. They also seem to be relevant to
"tpc.int."

Thanks

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email