IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Thu, 20 October 2022 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85680C14F724 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KeY-poLNshdS for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (mta-p6.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A11CEC1522BB for <last-call@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MtkjZ6ylQz9vxHJ for <last-call@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:45:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p6.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p6.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1A8gl_j_zPD2 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:45:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f70.google.com (mail-ed1-f70.google.com [209.85.208.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p6.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MtkjZ3qDwz9vxHD for <last-call@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:45:06 -0500 (CDT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mta-p6.oit.umn.edu 4MtkjZ3qDwz9vxHD
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mta-p6.oit.umn.edu 4MtkjZ3qDwz9vxHD
Received: by mail-ed1-f70.google.com with SMTP id c9-20020a05640227c900b0045d4a88c750so770015ede.12 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YhT4hVzls8BlHuH1nES9D8KQfojilEphpxAqsrowrOw=; b=T6ms18CsP1AGfGXnOuFHpIQnWm3iGcyNEPuhHzUMr0gt8IcLYZ9GYMN11dqhAS1RMs e9kG9p/iSXjjp8eRlPlwn9tTJjvFiiTr9+wlkrmf/R5D5t5cvkum6mn+DZzirBDEvAlv MmCjTb/OS/cHmoSz/lAtHxJusblr1joWAEMrtNNW1BoH6CJyf9SD64KfbZtYHZsulj+j jRjIBvWOgruLRsiuv6LNlQi9xRRBmG0iMXK9My8bYBFlLtgvBQjEvSW6Nw+s5AOzr9bl N3wwFXwYwzj6AUw3HopuDUDbrzwV7nVDFiZCH9ZCbzHWpofl9GCr44KkhsY7s6DKppt/ EaEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=YhT4hVzls8BlHuH1nES9D8KQfojilEphpxAqsrowrOw=; b=QJjkuLG14kUdMezrcdK/TWe2CcVesg3GjS3+J9l1o6x4vraMIk1UdOS4bJSq1aN6Nv 7vh631QylLjamvYDeGQTka+8Ri+FsI5X/zwSUeGn08/IWz7LimycaOxjeg7SpRHSydue sr1x9lVv7pmT4kedwbwKz5wWV7Tu1sb+A86DMa/ScdcEQLGF3+8zjPfBVXqboC9bTDgo 8XH47SOudzHB602VM7MgDWj8fCWqvBcwoTX5cHCHqEkxVDlO/n4pIvXXwwBZelH5Nk3y IfWA1VZZwWSg39RJyTQP8ps8bPEcusDayMNpqTiOi2jYTIDSKpV9hGpWBffDRlbhg2mJ z5Kw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0VnXS70m0CeVMSXsQEQO/73ixVdPw81r8TSwWM8ybe4jWcupKZ t58Qptf/hADi4TIEDTNFiQjHJ00DyPJ1NowASYMiZqdHetpVzj4Te54K2QVQieZc8CUwlMh7THP cyiLhdTAYXFFBh3AUxX9bC8uMtJflBeQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4446:b0:457:eebd:fe52 with SMTP id o6-20020a056402444600b00457eebdfe52mr14334114edb.234.1666309505434; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4JQ6WM6z96aMLZhkfhf/m4oyMEfIC27pbwt/deFEiuy4zNvDefwPBq+hzIrZ6Z+TRrTwv19NESMF72x7+e4yk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4446:b0:457:eebd:fe52 with SMTP id o6-20020a056402444600b00457eebdfe52mr14334087edb.234.1666309505073; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 16:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166621075802.44847.14382611991776479938@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAN-Dau0ioULBv40NjxgUpFMb0GEnL2wess=iq1h0ziUxU4qo8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau0ioULBv40NjxgUpFMb0GEnL2wess=iq1h0ziUxU4qo8A@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:44:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau0X3vV9Ch6_SE53tqt3eyw8C6fiBTB_USZdVHgu3QQnrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: last-call@ietf.org
Cc: draft-davies-int-historic@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000022d8ed05eb7feaca"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/CHZNWw9fMXTdUiqPMlmvRIGRQtE>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-davies-int-historic-04.txt> (Deprecating infrastructure "int" domains) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 23:45:40 -0000

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:52 PM David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 3:19 PM The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Abstract
>>
>>
>>    The document marks as historic any "int" domain names that were
>>    designated for infrastructure purposes, and identifies them for
>>    removal from the "int" top-level domain.  Any implementation that
>>    involves these domains should be considered deprecated.  This
>>    document also marks RFC 1528 and RFC 1706 as historic..
>>
>
> I'm interested in the rationale for RFC 1528 being marked as historic and
> not also RFC 1529, RFC 1530, and RFC 1703. They also seem to be relevant to
> "tpc.int."
>

Also, I’ll note the Document Shepherd Writeup says, “and updates RFC 1591
by removing the documented use of "int" for international databases.” The
document doesn’t include this, and I think it should.

Thanks

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================
-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email