Re: [Lsr] [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 06 July 2018 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC167130E8D; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJlUy4qgxJg3; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x22c.google.com (mail-pl0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B4DA130E03; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id s24-v6so2624149plq.6; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 02:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=uryqkUNSTGcEp8neLWPHnly5mz9bII2J545GKJDLEi4=; b=mvmCKfWg+AMj4BEPpSwjZZhegAqk+8o7/RmMKFTesfrIcfSBsihz/aji5AdfPLfWXp jigMLnMZObMqBEjKOPWAJuFedLVj5QaRbBO9w7rQx4j9dMDp1aswKrEOIR5LAmiVq/H0 bWNTWcquWWlXgNjG2u3prz2wuGnxuEOs8/9nc8APv3xz5bx1Yhphx38FJdLNTTWrpz5v Igtq5elIwq4rrV29H6H98zy+oPxs576mbIy3EYwonI8/a/HIdn7S3Iwg0E7xx3b+oC6k +H9Feowwmw9VlVGKrXLB5REDXpBci7zl3nioVoVs/avwmjo36LNGpNwkkzKmu/S3lqTg 1kGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uryqkUNSTGcEp8neLWPHnly5mz9bII2J545GKJDLEi4=; b=mfxD1vjTeo9IjNBDdyukekp4xtxt1V4IR3mVEWZVlfVABpKWT+0ZrtqeczRToiGej1 xZSbdC0KivIURg3zKu4uvz+TTiI2Fhi4B6xh7gUWCrQ43akdXls3orYvUXqzDj45l7Bn A4ekDgq9L7rzH93/6kXhk4QpnmrxdxE983eEqoz0W2+tThID4xyGx/xmpxTzzoUIFqWw 6Bth1ixMtJ1gdVoxEABftwLlg3FFt8XMiR4DZhiubfLTtdUVXxw6L0YMp4kcuTHbJfMd 9Dc7pxh5dGbig3C2HDuyHdcLmOQ3uJ2BPp5w1NFz53AeHl2O403HJdO+2ailX+DCq2d/ xK9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1DrhmT9R7OiBKJQPUMmvRBI2yqoCI7Xxn5YMkbqWmhMBxeKU7B vf+GFpcxp1sGdmJgePbEawbI0f49a3OuAwbTTaQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdLEOq41hFPzLZw/Pa6TYsOp2jEfbUQnByuk0gWNh8dK53IimVgLpJSlba11rF8bejsaFRhEPSYD1zQxKJiwKg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1007:: with SMTP id b7-v6mr9478089pla.277.1530869528755; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a17:90a:37e7:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2y3ep9q4z.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <E793174E-A65C-4E8D-89D7-DC602C5494E8@cisco.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8F43F070@dggemm512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <35FD4375-DF78-4E5B-A1A4-ACCC332A8E5E@cisco.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D8F43FE26@dggemm512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <m2y3ep9q4z.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:32:08 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vy9SusSFuyJBIgqKn49wEBv1Oks
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=1u=nyQ3edrqbyQ_8tuHWtynGoW==BWOEAV_1imTgJPQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, lsr@ietf.org, GMO Crops <grow@ietf.org>, opsawg@ietf.org, RTGWG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000075815b05705156b7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/9pqkPBuNxg2YzKvVnmtUublwRBw>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [OPSAWG] [GROW] FW: New Version Notification for draft-gu-network-mornitoring-protol-00.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 09:32:11 -0000

​Why anyone would need BMP wrapper to monitor IGP ?

BGP has been recently polluted enough that it works just perfectly fine
without a new draft/rfc or single line of code change to act as IGP
monitoring protocol.

Just enable  AFI 16388 / SAFI 71 as described in RFC7752 (possibly with
many additional follow-up extensions being currently cooked) and ride on.

r.

On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 2:14 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> robin,
>
> > It is not described clearly in the draft that reusing BMP is also a
> > possible option for monitoring IGP. We will refine the draft.
>
> if i could also use bmp for monitoring dns, smtp, and ntp, i could
> stop using nagios!
>
> i think what acee is trying to say is that "B" in BMP does not stand
> for Bypass.
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>