Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC293A0AE9 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=BpTmezgz; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=XrvXJrq2
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zzT2IyHdu7-m for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90FBB3A0B05 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3372; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1596125020; x=1597334620; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=4CNt8SqzmU4r8sECiP017Ph2W9Tk32igcn/XOVrldQ0=; b=BpTmezgzHgo7XxiPr6KFZV7QYASm41rU6F7zye205MQ12v1oSXJ7/jLW okQTcLZ8yObCwavEX15Mk9jBXTiPhsW0HW3P3+klDpwTD4LKp2p0xjhPw 8aF5wFBBmWUs3PHWv0JxsN7SfzxK1LpeQjrwDW2C4NUG/cNIvA0VFn1fk c=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0A1AADR7iJf/4YNJK1gGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQFAgTkBAQEBAQELAYFRKSgHb1gvLAqEK4NGA40rJZhiglMDVQsBAQEMAQEYCwoCBAEBhEwCF4IXAiQ3Bg4CAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FLwcmDIVxAQEBAwEBARAREQwBASwJAgEPAgEIGAICIwMCAgIlCxQBEAIEAQ0FIoMEAYJLAw4gAQ6lTgKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWFHhiCDgMGgQ4qAYJug1+GPxqCAIERJwwQgk0+glwBAQKBXReCfzOCLZI2PKMZCoJfmX8DHp90gSiMM4REnx8CBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkkgVdwFTsqAYI+UBcCDYgThgw3bgEJgkKFFIVCdAI1AgYBBwEBAwl8jksBgRABAQ
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:ba7/0hPX9+YKqnN3g3Ql6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEvK8x3lPMVJ/QrfNJl+SQtLrvCiQM4peE5XYFdpEEFxoIkt4fkAFoBsmZQVb6I/jnY21ffoxCWVZp8mv9PR1TH8DzNFHXq2e5qz8fBhu5MhB6daz5H4fIhJGx0Oa/s5TYfwRPgm+7ZrV/ZBW7pAncrI8Ym4xnf60w0RDO5HBPfrdb
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,415,1589241600"; d="scan'208";a="512186718"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 30 Jul 2020 16:03:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06UG3cIc011614 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:03:38 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:03:38 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:03:37 -0400
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:03:37 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JBWf+/xjKc2moHcGXtKDRtx8hPXKkso67yKKOdQH72FVm5omE6l3JuTJ2B3YfZRotbyayuuAswdX6Po/XruDO6SxT69HEFVWhy42LEtf4SKDzvKI1kHHDDBhuSt4GmvdSYFPkBVDfPjIg//ZTOqPpOzTp8vWxfvtPccDaP3WTm2ci8L0JAM0mm/Rx4XUgfPS4Wd0sY435Nn5aZ32mVILIAqM9bLwbmLtFkSRUoYEZcpNy+6xw9cxDwujMbYrgOn5Cw4BKQmxjGlZZaij/gbaw2t4YF5TehpfMyu+3epxc55vLRNBynbXd8MfkSdN06dCwohcy5WJsFNspDjRoxDXvA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4CNt8SqzmU4r8sECiP017Ph2W9Tk32igcn/XOVrldQ0=; b=b4QXj4V2w8BuMxrfNk57CCVB6K4mXKQKo4eE1aWXo2/KszsXK14Hmin8pLlSxxww7FrPrPGAtvnGyzMlAo6tP0xQb3giFFxrHakLyuIRrjJ4uwKjbXW87cmAEneYSiAxpJQ+qxPLzDlypaZp1eDe29xVpwo6fM8YkFwRtr1W1N522T2Z5LFFIcfaSj+7OiuUiYMi+8miNDabpa9Cmo8DRTDh9LuxcVo2l5gE9BzkRbmkXd4U/uIF5ODtCl+q4oN0YoyTo5J+kZXOEVd6scZcqlmiJfzI37nMJdF4dvkLdex0M7DD8+05MwPMHKx6drA69nxtYrTbnLRscR6VdbQC+w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=4CNt8SqzmU4r8sECiP017Ph2W9Tk32igcn/XOVrldQ0=; b=XrvXJrq2pIzx1JmgCKj1V2LsU4u19Z/GWJUXodAczBgilKz5/pbCINr1aw/5ImvIdzc0UcTf4A0YCP6OPRRHiepqc8xDme0O0NE4WVxK67T4RjaKs4DK4IN2o3qphA+XFkR4mBfwDptFIb/J/H3Bchn6FwEuov4urF0Knrq9FLI=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by BYAPR11MB2615.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:c3::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3239.16; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:03:35 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70a6:bb5b:16b:4f9b]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70a6:bb5b:16b:4f9b%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3239.019; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:03:35 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
CC: Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>, Xiaoyaqun <xiaoyaqun@huawei.com>, Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>, Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQIFxVYWa52TS3+lleUCjv1WJLVErai73FhQgAU+agCAACgfAIAABGUAgAAH84CAAAOxAIAAAi4AgAADkQCAAAhgAIAAC7UAgAAB8ACAAAKVgIAAAQUA///V8QA=
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:03:35 +0000
Message-ID: <BFB12E8C-8B18-4658-BC2F-4065CCB5C492@cisco.com>
References: <b85c277f-07d2-f40d-071d-295512ea7c73@cisco.com> <B1061E81-F9B6-4647-B5D6-B97D67C4AD8E@chinatelecom.cn> <fc0369b2-6f76-48f1-2c0e-e218e6db5e7b@cisco.com> <06CF729DA0D6854E8C1E5121AC3330DFAF71770C@dggemm509-mbx.china.huawei.com> <43f707e5-4409-670f-0983-0c672da53ecb@cisco.com> <96779843-a40d-e83b-8d24-baeb6c8648ea@cisco.com> <CAOj+MME7ADcnxe-m0JJ-EpWCzczhC6O8QY5xrxDQRA0w3aRGjQ@mail.gmail.com> <2a6844df-59ed-ca91-c306-d2288c44a1dc@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMFGJeNXsGgeram4uVaO5aDvQUTRbWL9N91NbQHvgP7M+A@mail.gmail.com> <9fa84c34-e3f5-42bd-2b6b-20a114acf3b3@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9fa84c34-e3f5-42bd-2b6b-20a114acf3b3@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.39.20071300
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5a276a5b-c354-46af-d8f8-08d834a21da1
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB2615:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB26156F11E42E4F3B7A744DB9C2710@BYAPR11MB2615.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: FeRLWh8DfW4K+U/KGwzgtdRuhdjz2kwLt2rZkvgVCqMNhI9aXtcRQgsBf6dB8eB1n1nmagXGy3J6jkOVZQ91BgHKwAIa1Ii82Fwl8vWkDY2cKkr7yqcMnhgA3/t1GfGjev0iWfTmntN9nUBq/Ho0jwD+uFVbiPjVj6AON8MjetjODaVz2eZ0xFFOvBMBPMm01qBmRZHT6R1Y65hEZIkYdDv30VNtgI72FYAKqE7qGaO9EYpEN3Hq6RXZJf4XXOGNw0eyge7peM9u9PQMq9NdtRU60kW6XJD2z9lKA9uNpd2jJU4X3+5ix6xjjpSzigh4re9q9btLluCpaWUAeqa6N/73Bs3tIOKhB32wEBsc82VkB9+IIL7TxinO+qaRCZ4jn24lln1ciB+jUw9Q++5mxw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(366004)(376002)(136003)(33656002)(6512007)(36756003)(54906003)(316002)(110136005)(83380400001)(4326008)(86362001)(71200400001)(6486002)(2616005)(2906002)(186003)(8676002)(966005)(66556008)(66476007)(66946007)(91956017)(478600001)(64756008)(6506007)(53546011)(76116006)(5660300002)(26005)(66446008)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CC70BA9080CE774DB0B251D102DFDDB5@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5a276a5b-c354-46af-d8f8-08d834a21da1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Jul 2020 16:03:35.8228 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: JudQpbCY6zbe3j6VADJQueENHQxQy7U43ifgc7sNkx5vtP4BLAFidKm7iksXrOUN
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB2615
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/B4ztVUmRi8oYgX6Kv8Un047HpbY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:03:44 -0000

So, how do we define a reachable route - is it any route subsumed by the summary LSA that we knew about in the past that becomes unreachable? When the PUA is withdrawn, how do we know whether it is because of expiration of the interval or the route becoming reachable again? This is a slippery slope. 
Thanks,
Acee

On 7/30/20, 10:34 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Peter Psenak" <lsr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

    On 30/07/2020 16:30, Robert Raszuk wrote:
    > Hey Peter,
    > 
    > Not sure how smart you really want to be here but keep in mind that BGP 
    > say option C may never hear about it all the way to the egress PE in 
    > other domain or area ... It is almost always incongruent with IGP.
    > 
    > So if the BGP path is installed it will indeed be at risk to resolve via 
    > less specific when it is still active BGP path and you too quickly 
    > remove info about unreachability.

    again, if you are smart you can use this info to your advantage, even 
    without putting it in the forwarding and leaving the less specific stuff 
    intact.

    Peter


    > 
    > Thx
    > R.
    > 
    > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:21 PM Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com 
    > <mailto:ppsenak@cisco.com>> wrote:
    > 
    >     On 30/07/2020 16:14, Robert Raszuk wrote:
    >      >      > 2:For bgp example,when the pe node down,the bgp peer
    >     must down
    >      >     within
    >      >      > 30 mintus,It will not get it up via cancle advertise pua.
    >      >
    >      >     for the above it is sufficient to advertise the
    >     unreachability for few
    >      >     seconds from each ABR independently. That would be a much
    >     more solid
    >      >     proposal.
    >      >
    >      >
    >      > Not sure about "few seconds" ... IBGP def hold time in number of
    >      > implementations is 180 sec :) .. but few minutes will work for sure.
    > 
    >     depends how you use it.
    > 
    >     If you can use the unreachable info in a smart way, it's sufficient if
    >     it is present for a very short time interval.
    > 
    >     thanks,
    >     Peter
    > 
    >      >
    >      > Thx,
    >      > R.
    >      >
    > 

    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    Lsr@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr