Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 27 July 2020 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A413A1B71 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=a3sW55TO; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=n1YP008y
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JPUj-c26c0dT for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F6C73A1033 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4948; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1595872268; x=1597081868; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=Lxdq0kkUFXxBYZLRBkGtvHU06HVF8vN/I5UOaiOWh38=; b=a3sW55TOlrj8mf+wyA/A4shaIqMJadpZt+HupPfQfw9j8AVZir4CMBQB n6GUxI5RmuKT5lGqReCQBnMbqDQdf5RK+R6GiDN3PTT4J6OId0XkuDuz9 iQrPbFxH5RfaVX/pMR+U4pJKv/nYTFkgbLKbSWw40REdkKaxdrxmfcYD8 g=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:wTgpUxeswDIfbhZVnxdrfgMBlGMj4e+mNxMJ6pchl7NFe7ii+JKnJkHE+PFxlwaTA9fQ6/NCgvbbt63rXmlG6pDS+HwBcZkZURgDhI1WmgE7G8eKBAX9K+KidC01GslOFToHt3G2OERYAoDyMlvVpHDh5j4THBzjOA54LePwXIXU3Iy70umo8MjVZANFzDO2fbJ1KkCwqgPc/skbiIdvMOA/0BzM93BJYO9Rg2hvIAGe
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CsBwAnEx9f/4cNJK1gHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQFAgUqBUlEHb1gvLAqEKoNGA40zJZhhglMDVQsBAQEMAQEYDQgCBAEBhEwCF4IQAiQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEGBG2FXAyFcQEBAQQBARAREQwBASkDCQIBCwQCAQgRBAEBAwIjAwICAiULFAEICAIEAQ0FGweDBAGCSwMuAQ6kCAKBOYhhdoEygwEBAQWBNwIOQYMqGIIOCYEOKoJtg1mGNxqCAIEQAScMEIFPfj6CXAEBAgEBFYEeKCaCcDOCLY8lBCWDEoZ/mwqBBQqCXohWjjeCYQMegnuBIYgnkyGBKYwrhEKKLpRsAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFqI4FXcBUaISoBgj4JRxcCDY4eN4M6hRSFQnQCNQIGAQcBAQMJfIxQgTQBgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,403,1589241600"; d="scan'208";a="794672680"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 Jul 2020 17:51:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (xch-rcd-002.cisco.com [173.37.102.12]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06RHp4RZ010474 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:51:05 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-RCD-002.cisco.com (173.37.102.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:51:04 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:51:03 -0500
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:51:03 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jpq6TNGNqw+zO8e/2zzYddV/SfZGdA5yGmesUorsW5CrEUOMLI7rcYD75kDVxGCa3gsXVOcArEwpnjoIoYWps81pOpVg9M9S7bX2G49sZM7uodXW/CQR6/VCMRhbiCBI1CDmfv5KBVtduDUxz9L3bFHf96esPwaxsqEhDKaqnsfbYK5PykGye6uwXfvVv8fZHpwVnkHkxnG9mz88zTylzQ+W8tDSDulmWKUyLDjTwwOr4Pd5rcUZ/MumZ1gzApz+kjmLUqX8CeRMt5p20MFk/laTMad2c6gEfHIxK9aqBb3qx1y68YVLBOCU6Agq+n5rNAsYQcgjUXeso9PmwWDrtQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Lxdq0kkUFXxBYZLRBkGtvHU06HVF8vN/I5UOaiOWh38=; b=ZOU7Q6ciVgQVXUEwZxXf0NK0O6DnBhy6dfFITE9V+B79uZi4yST+1Y8ua6MP55sGCCGyxPaNF+QaAiaYb+MYKfm7ZbR9j/no2oX9yIBf2VmAbDIlKlfhLkIHwT+VqVHvYHdtNaSbBxHGj1U3u93J7J8PvnVwUhQHXAFQaTMwdB1pSfmPWJrd2+2YmJPubsyaOFu+pHdxp+vRL92xdunGzOb9+NzKoh2P4ufS0SKLWGpaU83TlGfO+puoSNoRosxz2HXkeSYg4v6fJ0OY+K1DQeqT+4S5OxwGi0+VbvmXkJtBD8bDcNyoywBH438UWCPdkhp7xnG7q7KKqswTzg1gYw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Lxdq0kkUFXxBYZLRBkGtvHU06HVF8vN/I5UOaiOWh38=; b=n1YP008ytuY7i0BHSF12CjC0zHbLXT1lsNt4fPWdiGXxT5XcVYbo/ogOj6EwdYAe/5svxcOOlujrjl3Ac6oCYidZJWQoQher+Z0xJyOuoGR5OvcklZKagILttKSWJwuslyRmUbsohvvM8K9NkWkhlyC/0FkRWM6L0BaV7LRiWCk=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:89::27) by BYAPR11MB3367.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:79::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3216.21; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:51:03 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70a6:bb5b:16b:4f9b]) by BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::70a6:bb5b:16b:4f9b%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3216.033; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:51:03 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: 'Zhibo Hu' <huzhibo@huawei.com>, 'Yaqun Xiao' <xiaoyaqun@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt
Thread-Index: AQIFxVYWa52TS3+lleUCjv1WJLVErai73FhQgADS6IA=
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:51:02 +0000
Message-ID: <DE46CF44-A583-4754-8CAC-E2B2EFEF3E51@cisco.com>
References: <159581253012.15882.18408845608624077923@ietfa.amsl.com> <014a01d663b5$d8228660$88679320$@chinatelecom.cn>
In-Reply-To: <014a01d663b5$d8228660$88679320$@chinatelecom.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.39.20071300
authentication-results: chinatelecom.cn; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;chinatelecom.cn; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f6a6ebbd-3978-41bd-f8a4-08d83255a12a
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3367:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB33672980D9A60454A60275D7C2720@BYAPR11MB3367.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ezMyQEvRooJk54tAPhgxcy22KrkXg+JXg83ao3pUjiQfEC1T/ADstDYzHxHvoor6MyThzEJMHXy/F7yQhGjM1LRQPP2MmG+NGiPW4tUFTWqT7kURmX3DS95J8MvXIfvcqT39udzO5b78kePtHefNC2T0mRC2W1Tu1eWLHOwYAbP57BbOyHU7dvPamv3mK5f6ptyNgoCXQfPibU7s8JBI0QjBcPG+pKsuyvgcgNk9VEeR1+rOOkJ61bRnuPNajtcS0VL/V36i1c5MWC6w4jkC64zeImHWmtLo9eLLXdwcwvllUkLQEeA+X9V5EmD/yhFNxEVjw46+LMIePSvu2lNcLd+CYS9PAYbqzhHVn1aIbo54j5yo0VBYjlGMV3uzXYqxQRDcGXpcJrSgcrJ64IG3uw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(376002)(136003)(366004)(2906002)(6512007)(6486002)(8676002)(36756003)(110136005)(316002)(54906003)(66556008)(186003)(66476007)(91956017)(76116006)(66946007)(66446008)(66574015)(71200400001)(64756008)(2616005)(26005)(5660300002)(8936002)(53546011)(6506007)(4326008)(33656002)(86362001)(478600001)(83380400001)(15650500001)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5D6819A971B7A246929428BDC1899B6F@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR11MB2887.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f6a6ebbd-3978-41bd-f8a4-08d83255a12a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Jul 2020 17:51:02.9062 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xuOwjj3t2ESnHh89MNzK6+aZOZCtVcnybJr4B/nNhSUUYKAtPLbcMOaK6cjftBK/
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3367
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.12, xch-rcd-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/DwbVVQJVwwj2WEWav4gWq3z-WEY>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 17:51:14 -0000

Speaking as an LSR Working Group member:

Asking the WG precisely how to advertise prefix unreachability is the wrong question - it is analogous to asking whether to use a car or truck to drive off the edge of a cliff. Rather than messing up OSPF and IS-IS with these complex and unnecessary mechanisms, it would be better to address the requirement in your network design. Note that the unreachability of a given summarized prefix is only relevant if it is reachable through another ABR. In this case, the network design should provide adequate intra-area redundancy to provide communications between the ABRs. If this cannot be accomplished, an intra-area adjacency should be established over a tunnel between the ABRs in the backbone. Contrary to section 6.1, Looping is normally not a problem as ABRs should add back hole routes for their advertised summaries. 

Acee

On 7/26/20, 9:34 PM, "Lsr on behalf of Aijun Wang" <lsr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn> wrote:

    Hi, LSR experts:

    We have uploaded the new version of this PUA(Prefix Unreachable Announcement) draft. The main updates are the followings:
    1) Describes the solution that using tunnel to redirect traffic among ABRs, when all ABRs reaches the PUA limit.
    2) Describe fast rerouting to avoid routing black hole.
    3) Defining PUA capabilities announcements for OSPFv2/OSPFv3 and ISIS.

    There are also some arguments about the current solution for PUA, for example:
    1) Is it suitable to set the "Prefix Originator" sub-TLV to NULL to indicate the prefix is unreachable?
    2) if not, what's the consideration? What's the other convincible solution?

    Wish to hear comments and suggestions on the above issues. We will also have the presentation on the coming IETF LSR meeting.

    Best Regards

    Aijun Wang
    China Telecom 

    -----Original Message-----
    From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
    Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 9:16 AM
    To: Zhibo Hu <huzhibo@huawei.com>; Aijun Wang <wangaj3@chinatelecom.cn>; Yaqun Xiao <xiaoyaqun@huawei.com>
    Subject: New Version Notification for draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt


    A new version of I-D, draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt
    has been successfully submitted by Aijun Wang and posted to the IETF repository.

    Name:		draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement
    Revision:	03
    Title:		Prefix Unreachable Announcement
    Document date:	2020-07-27
    Group:		Individual Submission
    Pages:		11
    URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03.txt
    Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement/
    Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03
    Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement
    Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement-03

    Abstract:
       This document describes the mechanism that can be used to announce
       the unreachable prefixes for service fast convergence.




    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

    The IETF Secretariat



    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    Lsr@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr