Re: [Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem

Voting isn't the measure: rough consensus is the measure. I agree that a 
strawpoll would help establish if we have consensus, though.

I, of course, have always supported putting the registry into UTF-8. If 
folks are happy with the resolution to the parser compatibility issue, 
I'm happy to go to UTF-8.

So:

+1

Addison

Debbie Garside wrote:
> Couldn't we just put it to the vote?  I thought we had this discussion a
> year or so ago?
> 
> FWIW, my vote would be +1
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Debbie 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Peter Constable [mailto:petercon@microsoft.com] 
>> Sent: 10 July 2007 17:20
>> To: LTRU Working Group; ietf-languages@iana.org
>> Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem
>>
>>> From: Chris Newman [mailto:Chris.Newman@Sun.COM]
>>
>>> UTF-8 has been the recommend charset for Internet interchange since 
>>> RFC 2277.
>>> Our past experience with ASCII encodings of non-ASCII text 
>> in the IETF 
>>> has been questionable... Meanwhile, UTF-8 based IETF protocols have 
>>> been less problematic from an interoperability viewpoint...
>> Sound to me like good arguments for us to be considering 
>> UTF-8 for the LSTR.
>>
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ltru mailing list
>> Ltru@ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

-- 
Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG

Internationalization is an architecture.
It is not a feature.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru