Re: [Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem

"Mark Davis" <mark.davis@icu-project.org> Wed, 11 July 2007 21:13 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8jVJ-0005ZN-BE; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:13:45 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I8jVI-0005U3-CJ for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:13:44 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8jVH-0005Sl-LU for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:13:44 -0400
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.238]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8jVD-0007kU-77 for ltru@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:13:43 -0400
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id n1so1437655nzf for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=l5qOGmf88b8Z/cQ1CzSZETK+R6gijQ4SRefQg0uSiNgjcIy85SRhdJNeBbEhjbP/onn+Y/DM5ojNg6tUgECOQA2c/gX0PAcfHMXl1Chf7h5dZLgRdd3/YWpOpcfvXfO5cZQrk61GwO/8sTcdLq/3Mt3FmhQ4UeuEMWlRW5oOT/o=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=SjNViSkwZ6/9nTDS99x9gjI+jCUxqDvgiGk8s3nV7HvvjRUg98CtPmjNz5yIHs/cApf6rml74xAhPxWdmdGFXC+s3Wqm46Xn29O+MDdPz1YQzCX96/rTtVhSDETjSvEH6bqFcdPKKVSVQXE86HcRdWgzuaERwtI0YuIcsAvuhoU=
Received: by 10.115.49.16 with SMTP id b16mr5466106wak.1184188416454; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.196.12 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <30b660a20707111413t5cec1d3fs3d6bc83d3852dfa5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:13:36 -0700
From: Mark Davis <mark.davis@icu-project.org>
To: Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem
In-Reply-To: <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579560F3CD6B8B@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E1I8cnC-0002Sj-7h@megatron.ietf.org> <4694E57E.5030909@yahoo-inc.com> <DDB6DE6E9D27DD478AE6D1BBBB83579560F3CD6B8B@NA-EXMSG-C117.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8a7832582a154a48
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1676547e4f33b5e63227e9c02bd359e3
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1791491944=="
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

+1

On 7/11/07, Peter Constable <petercon@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 7:13 AM
> To: Debbie Garside
> Cc: Peter Constable; 'LTRU Working Group'
> Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem
>
> Voting isn't the measure: rough consensus is the measure. I agree that a
> strawpoll would help establish if we have consensus, though.
>
> I, of course, have always supported putting the registry into UTF-8. If
> folks are happy with the resolution to the parser compatibility issue,
> I'm happy to go to UTF-8.
>
> So:
>
> +1
>
> Addison
>
> Debbie Garside wrote:
> > Couldn't we just put it to the vote?  I thought we had this discussion a
> > year or so ago?
> >
> > FWIW, my vote would be +1
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Debbie
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Peter Constable [mailto:petercon@microsoft.com]
> >> Sent: 10 July 2007 17:20
> >> To: LTRU Working Group; ietf-languages@iana.org
> >> Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem
> >>
> >>> From: Chris Newman [mailto:Chris.Newman@Sun.COM]
> >>
> >>> UTF-8 has been the recommend charset for Internet interchange since
> >>> RFC 2277.
> >>> Our past experience with ASCII encodings of non-ASCII text
> >> in the IETF
> >>> has been questionable... Meanwhile, UTF-8 based IETF protocols have
> >>> been less problematic from an interoperability viewpoint...
> >> Sound to me like good arguments for us to be considering
> >> UTF-8 for the LSTR.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ltru mailing list
> >> Ltru@ietf.org
> >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ltru mailing list
> > Ltru@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>
> --
> Addison Phillips
> Globalization Architect -- Yahoo! Inc.
> Chair -- W3C Internationalization Core WG
>
> Internationalization is an architecture.
> It is not a feature.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
>



-- 
Mark
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru