Re: [martini] New text for gin section 7.1.1 first paragraph

I'm also happy with this text.

Now we get to confront the language police: is "... MUST ... unless P 
..." acceptable? (I'm pretty sure the logically equivalent "... if !P 
then MUST ..." has to be ok.)

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 9/27/2010 4:18 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
>
> I support this proposed text. I believe it strikes a good balance
> between mandating GRUUs and providing networks with alternative
> architectures the ability to implement routing as they see fit.
>
> /a
>
> On 9/27/10 2:30 PM, Elwell, John wrote:
>> As actioned on this evening's call, here is my proposed text:
>>
>> "An SSP needs to provide a means of assigning globally routable
>> contact URIs to UAs that have been registered using the bulk
>> registration mechanism specified in this document, thereby allowing
>> other entities to address out-of-dialog requests to those UAs. To
>> achieve this, an SSP MUST support the public GRUU mechanism described
>> in this section, unless the SSP has other means of providing globally
>> routable contact URIs (e.g., by acting as a B2BUA and performing
>> mapping between SIP-PBX-provided local contact URIs and SSP-provided
>> globally routable contact URIs)."
>>
>> John
>> _______________________________________________
>> martini mailing list
>> martini@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
>
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
>