Re: [martini] New text for gin section 7.1.1 first paragraph

Speaking as an individual here, I agree that the tradeoff Adam names is the 
right tradeoff, and I agree that the text John provided makes that tradeoff.

John, Thanks for the quick turn-around (as always).

Spencer

>  I support this proposed text. I believe it strikes a good balance between 
> mandating GRUUs and providing networks with alternative architectures the 
> ability to implement routing as they see fit.
>
> /a
>
> On 9/27/10 2:30 PM, Elwell, John wrote:
>> As actioned on this evening's call, here is my proposed text:
>>
>> "An SSP needs to provide a means of assigning globally routable contact 
>> URIs to UAs that have been registered using the bulk registration 
>> mechanism specified in this document, thereby allowing other entities to 
>> address out-of-dialog requests to those UAs. To achieve this, an SSP MUST 
>> support the public GRUU mechanism described in this section, unless the 
>> SSP has other means of providing globally routable contact URIs (e.g., by 
>> acting as a B2BUA and performing mapping between SIP-PBX-provided local 
>> contact URIs and SSP-provided globally routable contact URIs)."
>>
>> John
>> _______________________________________________
>> martini mailing list
>> martini@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
>
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini 