IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] Proposed draft charter

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 11 February 2020 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250FD12083C for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:50:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P_eCnQy6OqFD for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:50:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACFFA12006F for <masque@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:50:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id q8so13133528ljj.11 for <masque@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:50:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bH2VvEZn5K21XdHcN/jcH3+L2p7dxDbss6psLiC/qNU=; b=pymGoXDmSlxVEXGFBktDJmQHV1xiY3QvB/8jccNw0heYmopwVIwNZL2cm8mizTk5Ra VHGttnz63aYftyR1OVBHyPTK11WGhLJk5FdWz02G3w+2kmCMUN2QzmLb+gR78LrQjGtH aZ3ExRLavgI91KeTI7VEerscjNyCTIDXnu1gU4tcTqTLQJrUX1RHRatW+D/Zdk1QmBhP 8PDiZ2/XFLZcd+Cvtx/CVPm/nxbOwDnDxlNAx/9DPqPkPy7TtzihDCVxyU3tUJg+/r1r GQeyyQJHNaeFs6FTEp6g7+4HHOLbdNsFll28RQxv1cV2VD1LItjF9os6QKV9IAjkDtrf 2Q9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bH2VvEZn5K21XdHcN/jcH3+L2p7dxDbss6psLiC/qNU=; b=t7c5hdD040iZkxHOSTDEzaNLNaq1TVwoEr5nztQc7UBnwbJOTkmxj4uq2lPYPN/d6b D0kY065g+lHxjXOSXdFIfYMkPbfy5E7h8wdOpX+zbejWcnPDTCb2UbruQN6YVCGXwjAF ft9poBF+ocCjwqUN3xh9KlDq/RmAG5OuOhKTN3qOghlytLA/AOlpt0ooLAkWt09o6+PH 5K8OeT9Vn1x3VFNKqCxTGdZZeCQ3t8J71Keo4ckO9sfsoKXsMjaNCXlcCdWGFXf4dN1D 1pFJh1Fgw1I7t5yd7E8iAvPJ5z+AhlbmPjQORoRmj8ab6xDJy0HoQ4jSRtbuznw105NI Jh0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXvyHcSWgVGNyWtFkLnsytaJgX5qIZhtPBgam6Hi/DmxhbQagpo KD4ohaIByRU7dVPud7qAYnVULzClrWv64LIhmY/tWk0I
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4FQs3LXjwAm4KYAqwSpupEbsG2fdK2bYMc2c9H9W/m96fQQbVk9/J0ATj8Te1VMYOItidVNjS1vuMTBWbbeI=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b5b4:: with SMTP id f20mr5562627ljn.112.1581454232942; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:50:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <845946C2-EB98-4F3A-966E-968AE349302C@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBOJtyaa+J9PqoEZ7n8QahFy4n8nbBaCwUd0W+1BoMNnZQ@mail.gmail.com> <E68FB662-F6E5-49EE-AD92-AFCCCEA0CCE9@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBNEekD6GivQUvg8Gmz=_0EB1T_7PAeK=MNR_7+ObWJuTA@mail.gmail.com> <AE645E8F-6E17-4844-B8CC-373EB0909775@apple.com> <C58665A7-8550-4828-A7CD-603E3A64CFAF@ericsson.com> <1E734838-6F8E-4F13-AEEE-0A00F3E0C04C@apple.com> <CAKKJt-dFrVvcWUAVjAWMJHxk2BOhX+-y1R65i9KFLmB4SHDncA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dFrVvcWUAVjAWMJHxk2BOhX+-y1R65i9KFLmB4SHDncA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:50:05 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-dQ8SR-f7MLv372O9dnZWnRHxNNEFcdpWT3dVZJrB37Xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Kinnear <ekinnear=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "masque@ietf.org" <masque@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c87d23059e530186"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/dBtVMwHyCtdsrbT8wkZv0MkyQU4>
Subject: Re: [Masque] Proposed draft charter
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:50:37 -0000

Just following up - I had two questions, and people might have missed the
first one .

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 6:31 PM Spencer Dawkins at IETF <
spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm finally reading this charter, as opposed to looking at the words ...
> mostly, this looks fine to me.
>
> A couple of things inline.
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 6:05 AM Eric Kinnear <ekinnear=
> 40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> (Deleted down to )

>
>> QUIC is a good candidate protocol for tunneling these types of traffic,
>> as QUIC
>> provides secure connectivity, multiplexed streams, and connection
>> migration.
>> Further, HTTP/3 supports an established request/response semantic that
>> can be
>> used to set up and configure services.
>>
>
> The definition of QUIC as practiced in 2020 is "HTTP/3 over QUIC",
> although we certainly see proposals for other application protocols over
> something QUIC-like. Would something like
>
> "HTTP/3, carried over QUIC, is a good candidate protocol for tunneling
> these types of traffic, as QUIC
> provides secure connectivity, multiplexed streams, and connection
> migration.
> Further, HTTP/3 supports an established request/response semantic that can
> be
> used to set up and configure services."
>
> make that clearer?
>

(deleted)

Best,

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email