IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] Proposed draft charter

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 11 February 2020 12:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F66120116 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:25:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LnEvDz4TW3UL for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63940120112 for <masque@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id a13so11314222ljm.10 for <masque@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:25:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=58lzcRYEu3YF2nLCHUp/uez3kqImhe4sWD1uLvS/3AE=; b=yq3IUwo8SquVv2sWxuxnFjZ4WkBjvwh4iuIROAx1g20cxCWx4p23JgvJ5IXHgJ9VZx /0h1Fb7D87XWCxjz/au5/MNv1lE8NFlAHXjvMU8KepVXecQtcpGVtgDEAPl7Fjws7DmY HuF1yvNxyfjSmzd5C/sfFj/exfIDZEjAg3T40skSnVSjNaq2RIX6jZcpx5KIQg0BcTd5 8gVuS3syGGOqSB/n+T5E0xRH34lMIMCYUasuSGl1VtpnsMCy6KUfLl/GLcMiM+YTp9HO tKGsnTZqI2EC3Z0F3YnjwVjlRH7mLE6FRkgsCzR/9pdNFLAbfMBras6+dP4DXkSd0Eus Q8Eg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=58lzcRYEu3YF2nLCHUp/uez3kqImhe4sWD1uLvS/3AE=; b=MBv1/Z7JIGlO0puYpQV4tqgy6CqdQINp+Aiq3UKjpTaroAe8jzBEYnZuzLa6nKEcil Bucari3iUmFFrtqgIIs3bC5OlnHmkS5gtgVjS9qHDkNErbXKOmHhyjHbrRj/KD0fRTSw 1nY+OV5sGOkutFj5HQ5qGuxWUK28c/MRfSvXqsK4MpGinna6UzJ0ZKDRL0lHom7A5VhI akQRyedEJdLhnBhCAuJsfsZ7LmryEUL4K31iyz72KmRpKhgANn+0IHrydxpvpVNdgfur Bs277a/LHkHcjvgPbAKo6ZGqRlqDkvy9tW3dDVNXxF/rUvWJvN6/UZJpwfU2Q2I3YoR8 TKBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUto9aWHd1Bi0CwSUNzcCVaCxTo6N+sLyELaL/MSRDHjeooRyen ak81lFFxKcARKA2MyspW8tEmOKoaOGbcnVypUN4H8g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyukhbD+XMq/B3LM+xTxWXIXVqm2Dz+ckOPsRTlAkqcYSq/npQwm226yjC1FlIvYVxdiqvwhq5iFKAywUYOzPE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b12:: with SMTP id u18mr4122697lji.274.1581423937559; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:25:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <845946C2-EB98-4F3A-966E-968AE349302C@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBOJtyaa+J9PqoEZ7n8QahFy4n8nbBaCwUd0W+1BoMNnZQ@mail.gmail.com> <E68FB662-F6E5-49EE-AD92-AFCCCEA0CCE9@ericsson.com> <CABcZeBNEekD6GivQUvg8Gmz=_0EB1T_7PAeK=MNR_7+ObWJuTA@mail.gmail.com> <AE645E8F-6E17-4844-B8CC-373EB0909775@apple.com> <C58665A7-8550-4828-A7CD-603E3A64CFAF@ericsson.com> <1E734838-6F8E-4F13-AEEE-0A00F3E0C04C@apple.com> <CAKKJt-dFrVvcWUAVjAWMJHxk2BOhX+-y1R65i9KFLmB4SHDncA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMzzm5_pY1L0mqAxBLMdSEXretFb5DhQb8R=Sj_x1w4gQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-cVzaxxBqgw6pdCLBjKX_4PnjiFx5bOd6DW_ABeHFVzXw@mail.gmail.com> <b2869056-fbf5-9ff9-6874-d723157772b6@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <b2869056-fbf5-9ff9-6874-d723157772b6@huitema.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 04:25:01 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBO=QJS8MDhAbVcUD_pPp5a0ULBLbFFs37oJvAN4_F9tWQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "masque@ietf.org" <masque@ietf.org>, Eric Kinnear <ekinnear=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009b143059e4bf497"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/yz-iOVXLZIlcddsNyR1iSfxTzdQ>
Subject: Re: [Masque] Proposed draft charter
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:25:42 -0000

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 8:26 PM Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
wrote:

>
> On 2/10/2020 7:18 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
>
>
>>> I'm a little confused here, about whether (HTTP/3-)QUIC is also in scope
>>> as a proxied protocol. Does everyone else know whether it is, and I'm just
>>> catching up?
>>>
>>
>> Well, it's just UDP, so yes.
>>
>
> :-)
>
> Actually, that's still not entirely clear. There are two ways of
> connecting UDP: connected sockets, or full sockets. One is adequate for
> proxying a Quic client: a Quic datagram stream is associated with a five
> tuple on the proxy. The other is what you want for a Quic server: a Quic
> datagram stream is associated with a 3-tuple on the proxy. It is not clear
> to me whether we are speaking of one or the other.
>
> I assume that we are speaking about the five-tuple variant, which is
> equivalent to a TCP connection. But this is not obvious from the charter.
>
I think we should specify the client->server piece first and see how that
goes. The other one is harder and has more policy issues, as we found with
TURN

-Ekr

> -- Christian Huitema
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email