IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] WGLC for <draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-04.txt>

Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com> Thu, 24 January 2008 12:56 UTC

Return-path: <mboned-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JI1d4-0005QH-8g; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:56:26 -0500
Received: from mboned by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JI1d3-0005PU-Ke for mboned-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:56:25 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JI1d3-0005PM-Ae for mboned@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:56:25 -0500
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JI1d2-0003aM-UV for mboned@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:56:25 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,244,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="3860996"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2008 13:56:12 +0100
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0OCuCIu020025; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:56:12 +0100
Received: from xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-332.cisco.com [144.254.231.87]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m0OCtolL027398; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:56:04 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-332.cisco.com ([144.254.231.73]) by xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:55:51 +0100
Received: from [10.31.246.187] ([10.61.65.131]) by xfe-ams-332.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:55:51 +0100
Message-Id: <8FE4447F-C505-467C-966A-2E760066A7B4@cisco.com>
From: Dino Farinacci <dino@cisco.com>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
In-Reply-To: <73E65BAB-99DA-48F9-B74E-98A8D3D26F88@multicasttech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Subject: Re: [MBONED] WGLC for <draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-04.txt>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:55:50 -0800
References: <26945.1201000836@aber.ac.uk> <758A010F-C191-4CFB-A664-F10183B44BDD@cisco.com> <20080122150510.GL22077@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <52706D79-EEB0-4B32-8267-61C8223ED619@cisco.com> <20080122161511.GN22077@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <CAED59CF-E413-4091-A726-B70F6B4CE734@cisco.com> <73E65BAB-99DA-48F9-B74E-98A8D3D26F88@multicasttech.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2008 12:55:51.0257 (UTC) FILETIME=[72AD1C90:01C85E88]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=905; t=1201179372; x=1202043372; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dino@cisco.com; z=From:=20Dino=20Farinacci=20<dino@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[MBONED]=20WGLC=20for=20<draft-ietf-mbo ned-ipv4-uni-based-mcast-04.txt> |Sender:=20; bh=FGpat9EdoNwIIISs+8jIgVNkAyQZlSAhXajq6U4gBRw=; b=hhH/8AW3ARsK43lh5REHGhpeCyamgiDTZvpst4UzSHL/B90Lw2ADT1d+fr 7f7l3kxSB9jcHg7DK5zsBlvQzb3zqnQ6W5uBHMd5C/EZAW/u8MDGmAVeKQgh L1wONyfLGP;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=dino@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Cc: mboned@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mboned-bounces@ietf.org

>> But you can go get an ASN and not use it for BGP purpose but do use  
>> it for GLOP addressing. Then you decouple yourself from your  
>> upstream provider.
>>
>
> I think that there is a big problem with this suggestion :
>
> Soon, 16 bit ASN will become unavailable. (January, 2009, the RIRs  
> will only give them out by request,
> January 2010, they will not distinguish between the 16 and 32 bit  
> pools, which means in practice you
> will get a 32 bit one.)
>
> There is no GLOP space for 32 bit ASN. We are working on a I-D to  
> address this, but it is not there yet.

Use eGLOP and/or draft-ietf-mboned-ipv6-uni-based_mcast-04.txt.

> (There are other problems, but this is a big one.)

I want to start solving the problems so there are no excuses. But my  
interpretation of all this is that we have solved the problems so why  
are there still obstacles.

Dino



_______________________________________________
MBONED mailing list
MBONED@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email