IETF Logo Mail Archive

[media-types] WG: Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 09 November 2021 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3123A07BC for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:38:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7nqkgtDFdWWL for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D218D3A040A for <media-types@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 07:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.3.157] (unknown [78.156.11.215]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBE0C7C73F2 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:37:59 +0100 (CET)
To: media-types@ietf.org
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <c70cd535-127f-640f-99ec-8a8e517d7eca@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 16:37:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/2DEvUeOYeqMrEKIdaO4A-djT_9Y>
Subject: [media-types] WG: Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 15:38:08 -0000

The following opinion polls were taken at the IETF meeting of MEDIAMAN, 
which translate directly into WG decisions if confirmed on the mailing list.

The questions asked, with hand raised / hand not raised numbers:

- Should there be a process for creating a new top level type? (10:2)

- Should we adopt the haptics draft? (14:0)

- Should we adopt the suffixes draft? (10:0)

If the list agrees with the consensus answers to this question, the 
chair will:

- Start work for writing up a process on how to create a new top level type

- Instruct the "haptics" authors to republish as an IETF draft

- Instruct the "suffixes" authors to republish as an IETF draft

If you wish to support or oppose any of these decisions, please reply to 
this message explaining your position.

Harald

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email