Re: [MMUSIC] NEED WG CONSENSUS: media-loopback is all-or-nothing

NO. 

I see no reason to mandate that all media is looped back.

Regards
Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan
> Sent: 20 November 2012 18:16
> To: mmusic@ietf.org (E-mail)
> Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo; draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [MMUSIC] NEED WG CONSENSUS: media-loopback is all-or-nothing
> 
> Howdy,
> during IESG review of the media-loopback draft, a discussion arose
> regarding the language around indicating media-loopback support per
> media description (i.e., per m-line), in sections 3.1 and 3.2.
> 
> My interpretation/understanding was we were requiring ALL m-lines to
> indicate media-loopback; in other words it's an all-or-nothing in both
> the offer+answer, and either every media stream is looped back, or none
> are.  However the text currently doesn't make this clear, and it could
> be argued either way, with pro's/con's either way too; so I'd like the
> WG's consensus on whether it should in fact be an all-or-none approach,
> or not.
> 
> Please respond to this email by **Tuesday, December 4th** with a "YES"
> if the draft should mandate ALL media be looped-back, or "NO" if it
> should allow a hybrid approach of some streams being looped while
> others are not.
> 
> For reference, the draft is here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-24
> 
> -hadriel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic