Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Working Group Virtual Interim Meeting, June 17, 2013

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Fri, 31 May 2013 10:46 UTC

Return-Path: <emil@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A310321F910D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2013 03:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrW010ZHSdmb for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2013 03:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22f.google.com (mail-bk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A7021F938E for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2013 03:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id jg9so318467bkc.34 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2013 03:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=GWh5+EFshjpA0WCpt+1TVtrrlIeOKqI3IfGG7bMXJ+8=; b=RXCKz//MnWWr7Wpr8N5k78H/RqizDlD4WgJVZsiWuPIPWFFhWwzPQ60sqfY+B+Tbea mI0Rc0oH0sSHObV6pxj/oRfWEMXgbwUc7bf8HYuSZG36RJH/QTfHdlIYWa5fPs3DTr6u psahtffPCs5Wn95VXSP7isWLt0vk9Q3kwCzztNbJ5EjEnPINckKYBHzGFkUBQro07RXk gF+4KIqYDsXYZUfkK/tSSO2LjKYv1tNvedDIxGAGmmEMz2XikPOwm5pLJ+X9ktFKzgTX T8fWJGYzttMGbZIS6zLRvbBvJ2Ad99QDgxCRVMsZrwaiD9bJirk7r1XNo6pfLDOynJPy 9F5Q==
X-Received: by 10.204.191.72 with SMTP id dl8mr1999975bkb.56.1369997204903; Fri, 31 May 2013 03:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from camionet.local (77-85-161-202.btc-net.bg. [77.85.161.202]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jy7sm6642162bkb.6.2013.05.31.03.46.43 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 31 May 2013 03:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51A87F93.1070009@jitsi.org>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 13:46:43 +0300
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Organization: Jitsi
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
References: <51A6700B.40108@cisco.com> <CABkgnnWPHGcwDmzVAVJaFynxCjj-7F-mCGZ2NQHzW=Zjqbnd1g@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBDyN5THD-qH=U4yxRxwpmVGYtNCfnubntJEZ3KQhw_6Enefg@mail.gmail.com> <51A7A2B9.5020909@cisco.com> <CABkgnnUz6qzsVF-dXzpmLJ-Yb=RMVdMpRoQy6SstgyQzUX1tRA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUz6qzsVF-dXzpmLJ-Yb=RMVdMpRoQy6SstgyQzUX1tRA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQngIMwAwiZILtwGYgbMyEgguULKl8pteaUGmL+qsApt7gQ4VmqH6Rx3msIAnntcjhmFuHsf
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Working Group Virtual Interim Meeting, June 17, 2013
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 10:46:46 -0000

On 30.05.13, 22:08, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 30 May 2013 12:04, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> wrote:
>> I'm not trying to be facetious, but it is genuinely hard to say when the
>> draft hasn't been announced or discussed in MMUSIC (and this is not the only
>> draft that suffers from that). It seems the bulk of the work and discussions
>> happen in RTCWeb but with an expectation that decisions are to be made in
>> MMUSIC. Maybe this is part of the reason for the lack of progress on this
>> one and we should reconsider the approach ?
>
> That is a perfectly reasonable response.  I believe that having the
> discussion piecemeal across different working groups hasn't helped at
> all.
>
> In part, I was hoping that Emil would explain why he chose to tag his
> draft as rtcweb rather than mmusic.

Seriously? The three drafts that are currently part of the agenda are:

draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a-00
draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00
draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00

By the time No Plan arrived *all* Plan A vs Plan B discussions had been 
happening on the rtcweb mailing list. If chairs and contributors believe 
that it should instead be happening elsewhere, I would be happy to post 
wherever they redirect it to.

Emil

-- 
https://jitsi.org