Re: [MMUSIC] Congestion control

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Tue, 11 June 2013 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC29D21F88EA for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 03:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.651, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ec74HkJ2GcW1 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 03:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc2-s14.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s14.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.89]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F243E21F8C4C for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 03:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU404-EAS235 ([65.55.111.72]) by blu0-omc2-s14.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 03:05:31 -0700
X-TMN: [A/yAF0Y+oZR4N0LtzPxoTs70LdLwoCnR]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU404-EAS23506E27752A1E0E07558BC93850@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <20130530185619.4124.56395.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51A87F91.2080500@jitsi.org> <51AEA08D.8090103@cisco.com> <BLU403-EAS336A4AA94CDB5E97170F9A5939F0@phx.gbl> <25B9903E-DC06-4BB0-92A1-C1E7A2AA569E@iii.ca> <BLU169-W609A2EAD331201B824EB6093980@phx.gbl> <4D8F5FFC-F89B-4A5B-8464-3EF20E7D67E9@iii.ca> <BLU169-W35E035EC4AC7AE5BBCCBBC93840@phx.gbl> <BAF96BD5-D167-4B78-AF92-DDB2DE780A32@iii.ca>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <BAF96BD5-D167-4B78-AF92-DDB2DE780A32@iii.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 03:05:28 -0700
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2013 10:05:31.0870 (UTC) FILETIME=[352927E0:01CE668B]
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Congestion control
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:05:38 -0000

VoIP typically doesn't use layered coding or simulcast. Also, earlier there was a discussion of using signaling vs. Magnus' codec operation point to control resolution, which in the case of spatial scaling would involve addition or removal of layers - and as I recall, signaling won. 

On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:10 PM, "Cullen Jennings" <fluffy@iii.ca> wrote:

> 
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 4:16 AM, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Cullen said: 
>> 
>> 
>> " No O/A is request to stop sending RTP packets on a given stream. "
>> 
>> [BA]  So you're saying that you don't expect a=sendrecv/recvonly/sendonly to be used in Plan A to control streams described by individual m lines?    I had assumed that the O/A behavior described in RFC 3264 Sections 5.1 and 6.1 would apply in Plan A.  
> 
> Bernard - do you really think the "a=sendrecv/recvonly/sendonly " is how we do congestion control for VoIP? I don't think that is the approach that WeRTC will take to congestion control. Of course "a=sendrecv/recvonly/sendonly  are part of SDP but they are not how anyone other than you has proposed to do congestion control. I think you would agree they would be a pretty non optimal way to do congestion control. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>