[MMUSIC] MMUSIC Working Group Virtual Interim Meeting, June 17, 2013

Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> Wed, 29 May 2013 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fandreas@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C2921F96FE; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67jssf2KlQZc; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13C3921F96EC; Wed, 29 May 2013 14:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1278; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1369862157; x=1371071757; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=HScF0FcPhA9HulXcyFaeavZi4+wLM6AwogZw4PMWneY=; b=mq4TzzoeFtGXQpqG/sI4IU3nVDm5yNNFNj9pwkSshW9edx60uSr5VW4q Z2RDG3Oz4fp90BQLaY5WAAbih9RmldIt94hGim0JP1I9tymYmqg+BN8hq Yjt5zxe/avMHfLVF8zAd0m8LPKceZZen75lc13bNBIQgxP7P1moO0rBep U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AokGAM9uplGtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABagwkwwgSBChZ0gmJBPDQCTA0BBwEBBYgEDLl9jxODXgOXO5FAgysg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,766,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="216454514"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2013 21:15:56 +0000
Received: from rtp-fandreas-8714.cisco.com (rtp-fandreas-8714.cisco.com [10.117.7.85]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4TLFtTs019149; Wed, 29 May 2013 21:15:56 GMT
Message-ID: <51A6700B.40108@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:15:55 -0400
From: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Working Group Virtual Interim Meeting, June 17, 2013
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 21:16:02 -0000

Greetings

This is to announce a(nother) virtual interim meeting for the MMUSIC Working Group to take place on Monday, June 17, from 7:00 am - 10:00 am
Pacific Time. The goal of this meeting is to come to a resolution on the so-called "Plan A" or "Plan B" approach related to SDP signaling needed
by RTCWeb, CLUE, etc. (i.e. do we have potentially lots of "m=" lines or very few "m=" lines and to what extent is there sub-negotation and
signaling at the SSRC level).

A more detailed agenda and logistics will be sent out separately. For now, people should take a close look at the following two drafts:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a-00.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt

You may also want to look at
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00.txt


Thanks

-- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)


PS: Per our previous interim meeting announcement, we tried to schedule a longer and in-person physical interim meeting, however it has proven impossible to find a set of dates where we could get critical mass for such a meeting. Scheduling even a virtual interim before the Berlin IETF has been surprisingly difficult with the above date being the only viable option at this point.