[Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-10
Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 26 August 2025 16:56 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBDB59431D7; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMjngWgrP_yb; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9AA859431D0; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-32597b88f0dso2193417a91.3; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1756227384; x=1756832184; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jaNuYOLnyHPQ8BiprbRCQ7J9n5GLRUeqcRALFEJcybk=; b=IQav3nszoKfJemlWpt56gwcH0iuE9uf9Tn7ySlBk49sXw6ukz7wCPd7K2n47hFI/LD PGwQJIz/6sF5BlRu5VI3+hQ5fAvkAe6nd2hELtpFqrUj87S6sSYuUkGrZ4YaZ33luUfu vGGuCh3AmGg6o6a93E2T5nsKFpoTWHppWggwN9T0hS0S9COh46VM2+vsirhHIMCpLD/g CZTP/0sz8LmesjxTohVwZwvF8SoJQnMDbXKvW9mt2cNKDb/O/jAQeWrwcOg3nSMxxpkK OiaNMotB3Tk04wCgjJz4OmmXfA95v/3XBjaOCCsVksmq3WtxbT/TUS+OtzCDYPuS5aXj Xp2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1756227384; x=1756832184; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jaNuYOLnyHPQ8BiprbRCQ7J9n5GLRUeqcRALFEJcybk=; b=cEzwWpS2cmLWIAStTVr03KVKXIlLMetT6T4uKzThFfshEfKYPU9beJvTvX6AkKUX78 D9sDFGLrjBe/Z0Jwe2r05Z0PakGqiQAb+J33J0g5UMyc16fSD6eGl886f/PSSuXVmCF2 FyK9xsqLybnIk+qCzz9xE76s71cSjG+ceqKn/T9O/oI6GrQcke/M6DJFdILVpRNwpsV5 84OFKQmA+gHlVq9T7JyILAzC2/isLIr9vYrGcx8qpwlsEZWfY2v6pColRj9YKRpI2rQP cmrPeiCqAW4CQJHvfhEpZQMTXGZa+OZobrRFW6x0cqxv4FJi9T6qcfSDokvaZVZPRFl3 rriQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUBcruvtYygBXWV72rRuXtCcrJweh4GGpUD4zFLhL65r2pVh3+q6q34lZ2ZRMJzLomRy8BSXTfomuxsy5Xj@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyf3mNtD2pbXqx7bKmTGOaGZ2E7BuSmIVzSdIPCBfgtKAT39EKW WIA0wM3sFCmgSU2gKpLhWjB0xJzEiPcp+Z61rYfCH0Iic3UIE7oSyPrVGJzN47mSLnI1qQeU6Ck qduZTwhp8Sx6sSs7WvGCfeB8kIXjjGl/g92zR
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuZx/DLWmbwC9e3DNuKLFbY82mHK6vD/ZNYz0jOjJQMJZ7iwEpqRFPuBqrISeE +Vqo2SXJJrF5RaV58pZ9pQULx6SZLdeDuX5ayhdaHrIPZkoUxVNJRom/GD3pbrcFn1uE1Tr5ZSk 8mbcH9Hq1ZmQj8Wy0WR8BBBbUjvlgA/uyRArRNBNIh8xgU8Dl0QMOWSwRcfJt4sHFzUL3/eaGvc irVkhCzOxQEUlqsbNcZZCuJkouhS+vNzDAkxvKC
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFX+iJuuh7/Zfgj4eZWXmGHRWch3ihHEvqRBGf2D8s8aDyFt8lGpOp0MSQtQi5wdMEk61ynh2saQS5Nh60D3W0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a81:b0:324:dfdc:6de3 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3251744bd85mr21679323a91.20.1756227384322; Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:56:12 -0700
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXxI_lj4kunQ8zW7KlxCd9HqbMBKF7u4c--_j7zR2wI1hgNOljCzflas_TE
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sz1s0RdQv+nMsCGJ-bJzq08G3OM0M+qf2t=Zuzz16FnZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Moderation Discussion <mod-discuss@ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>, Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006334e2063d478d6c"
Message-ID-Hash: MBH4ZFZPG2FXHAHI5ZQ7AVU3XMYWAK6O
X-Message-ID-Hash: MBH4ZFZPG2FXHAHI5ZQ7AVU3XMYWAK6O
X-MailFrom: sayrer@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-0; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-1; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-2; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-3; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-4; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-5; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-6; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes-10
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF moderation policies and practices <mod-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mod-discuss/H47oEDK9zcHpcERPraxQLKZWza4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mod-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:mod-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mod-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mod-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mod-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mod-discuss-leave@ietf.org>
Hi, >> iv) Section 4 "comity" - not only is that an exceptionally unusual word even for native English speakers >> and therefore making this unnecessarily hard to understand, it is effectively setting a new policy as >> regards the intent of moderation. > > You're not the first to complain. Please come up with a better word. As a previous complainer, I opened an issue with a few suggestions. Feel free to mix and match: https://github.com/larseggert/draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes/issues/153 I think actions should be taken, not attempted. The word "comity" is not unusual if you've been doing your homework by reading the classics, but it is never said in contemporary speech, and is unusual in an IETF document. Feel free to do better and one-up me. :) thanks, Rob
- [Mod-discuss] WG Last call for draft-ietf-modpod-… Lisa Dusseault
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Jeffrey Haas
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Joel Halpern
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Lisa Dusseault
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Russ Housley
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Jay Daley
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… John Levine
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Jay Daley
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Jay Daley
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Jay Daley
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Colin Perkins
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Stephen Farrell
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Stephen Farrell
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… D. J. Bernstein
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… D. J. Bernstein
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… D. J. Bernstein
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Stephen Farrell
- [Mod-discuss] Terms? Re: WG Last call for draft-i… Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Terms? Re: WG Last call for dra… Lars Eggert
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Terms? Re: WG Last call for dra… Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Terms? Re: WG Last call for dra… Stephen Farrell
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Terms? Re: WG Last call for dra… Lars Eggert
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Salz, Rich
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- [Mod-discuss] Keith Moore's response to WGLC (was… Keith Moore
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Michael De Roover
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Michael De Roover
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Michael De Roover
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Michael De Roover
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Is there a problem? [was Keith Moor… Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? Ted Lemon
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? D. J. Bernstein
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? Ted Lemon
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? Nick Hilliard
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? D. J. Bernstein
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? Ted Lemon
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? Lisa Dusseault
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … D. J. Bernstein
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Ted Lemon
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Ted Lemon
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Ted Lemon
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Is there a problem? [was Keith … Watson Ladd
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … John C Klensin
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … John C Klensin
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … John C Klensin
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … John C Klensin
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Simon Josefsson
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Nick Hilliard
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … D. J. Bernstein
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Ted Lemon
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Ted Lemon
- [Mod-discuss] RFC7282 relevant? [Re: Keith Moore'… Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: RFC7282 relevant? [Re: Keith Mo… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: RFC7282 relevant? [Re: Keith Mo… Michael De Roover
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Nick Hilliard
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Keith Moore
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Nick Hilliard
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Lars Eggert
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Pete Resnick
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Eliot Lear
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Keith Moore's response to WGLC … Nick Hilliard
- [Mod-discuss] Admin overriding moderator [was Kei… Brian E Carpenter
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Admin overriding moderator [was… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Admin overriding moderator [was… John C Klensin
- [Mod-discuss] Re: Admin overriding moderator [was… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Sean Turner
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Jay Daley
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Christopher Wood
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Sayre
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Sean Turner
- [Mod-discuss] Re: WG Last call for draft-ietf-mod… Rob Sayre