IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls-tp] poll to makedraft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-03.txt aworking group document

"Rolf Winter" <Rolf.Winter@nw.neclab.eu> Thu, 23 July 2009 08:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Rolf.Winter@nw.neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9BA3A68ED for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.795, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hJY1MTfBxzoH for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428D63A698D for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A702C02049F; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:24:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0AV2u3GjSx0h; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:24:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VENUS.office (mx1.office [192.168.24.3]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E2F2C0004E5; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:24:02 +0200
Message-ID: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671CA70287@VENUS.office>
In-Reply-To: <4A681962.5000503@chello.nl>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] poll to makedraft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-03.txt aworking group document
thread-index: AcoLbCP1DRKityFNQuO8wNB77N0j5gAAgWrA
References: DEFANGED[65061]:<4A4A1EFA.6040101@pi.nu><6FD21B53861BF44AA90A288402036AB4025823D2@FRVELSMBS21.ad2.ad.alcatel.com><4A539180.8070807@pi.nu><000c01ca047e$236e44e0$0601a8c0@allison><b2d141720907140657l6b348e65v720cacedf7f77034@mail.gmail.com><4A5C92F8.4070401@pi.nu><001401ca0 " " 49c$7d471460$0601a8c0@allison><1ADC4D4503D34272A6E4571276EB7FD8@your029b8cecfe> <005a01ca0ae9$a46f5d60$0601a8c0@allison> <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671CA7025A@VENUS.office> <4A681962.5000503@chello.nl>
From: Rolf Winter <Rolf.Winter@nw.neclab.eu>
To: hhelvoort@chello.nl
Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] poll to makedraft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-03.txt aworking group document
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:25:25 -0000

But you have seen that it might directly become a historical RFC, right :) Ok, I see both your and Nurit's point. But then the IAB draft seems to me to really have a trivial message which is: "If you work on the same thing talk to each other". Which is probably fine. I concur.

	Rolf


NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huub van Helvoort [mailto:hhelvoort@chello.nl]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2009 10:04
> To: Rolf Winter
> Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] poll to makedraft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-
> 03.txt aworking group document
> 
> Hi Rolf,
> 
> You wrote:
> 
> > There is an alternative for this draft I believe, at least for its
> > content. The IAB seems to be in love with how the whole MPLS-TP
> > process is working
> > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-mpls-tp-uncoord-harmful). Good
> > for them but they fail to mention how the overall process is working
> > in practice. I'd propose to merge the two. I fail to see why we need
> > a document that praises the process and another one describing it.
> 
> I do not agree with you, the draft above is a hysterical document
> describing what happened before the JWT was created, and
> draft-andersson-mpls-tp-process describes the current process as
> agreed by the JWT.
> We should concentrate on current mode of operation and not waste
> precious time on history.
> 
> Regards, Huub.
> 
> --
> ================================================================
> Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email