[mpls-tp] uncoord harmful draft

Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl> Sat, 25 July 2009 05:25 UTC

Return-Path: <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
X-Original-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015483A68A5 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id liYPX+lb0Ma4 for <mpls-tp@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep14-int.chello.at (viefep14-int.chello.at [62.179.121.34]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038453A6407 for <mpls-tp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge05.upc.biz ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep14-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090725052500.EOS18330.viefep14-int.chello.at@edge05.upc.biz>; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:25:00 +0200
Received: from McAsterix.local ([212.112.167.84]) by edge05.upc.biz with edge id L5Qy1c00u1pbGYL055QztG; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:25:00 +0200
X-SourceIP: 212.112.167.84
Message-ID: <4A6A9729.2040502@chello.nl>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:24:57 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <hhelvoort@chello.nl>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
References: DEFANGED[65061]:<4A4A1EFA.6040101@pi.nu><6FD21B53861BF44AA90A288402036AB4025823D2@FRVELSMBS21.ad2.ad.alcatel.com><4A539180.8070807@pi.nu><000c01ca047e$236e44e0$0601a8c0@allison><b2d141720907140657l6b348e65v720cacedf7f77034@mail.gmail.com><4A5C92F8.4070401@pi.nu><001401ca0""49c$7d471460$0601a8c0@allison><1ADC4D4503D34272A6E4571276EB7FD8@your029b8cecfe> <005a01ca0ae9$a46f5d60$0601a8c0@allison><547F018265F92642B577B986577D671CA7025A@VENUS.office><4A681962.5000503@chello.nl><547F018265F92642B577B986577D671CA70287@VENUS.office> <077E41CFFD002C4CAB7DFA4386A532640111FD5B@DEMUEXC014.nsn-intra.net> <6FD21B53861BF44AA90A288402036AB4025E61F2@FRVELSMBS21.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704982909064A@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <DF7F294AF4153D498141CBEFADB17704982909064A@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls-tp] uncoord harmful draft
X-BeenThere: mpls-tp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hhelvoort@chello.nl
List-Id: MPLS-TP Mailing list <mpls-tp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls-tp>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls-tp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp>, <mailto:mpls-tp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:25:05 -0000

(changed subject as asked for by Loa)

Hi Ross,

You wrote:

> I think that this draft is absolutely essential.  However, I do agree that discussing it in long email threads would likely be a waste of time. 
> 
> I doubt that you want to hear my opinion about the amount of time and effort that the T-MPLS work in ITU forced on various IESG/IETF folks. 

You may want to add that to the draft, but then continue discussion
on ietf@ietf.org and iab@iab.org as Andy suggested.

Regards, Huub.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BUSI ITALO
> Sent: 23 July 2009 05:14
> To: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); ext Rolf Winter; hhelvoort@chello.nl
> Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] poll tomakedraft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-03.txtaworking group document
> 
> The analysis of the T-MPLS case study in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-mpls-tp-uncoord-harmful is
> technically weak and incorrect.
> 
> I think this draft is a waste of time for the whole community.
> 
> Italo 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org 
>> [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sprecher, 
>> Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 10:50 AM
>> To: ext Rolf Winter; hhelvoort@chello.nl
>> Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] poll 
>> tomakedraft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-03.txtaworking group document
>>
>> Hi,
>> Surprisingly, although it should be trivial, it was not 
>> trivial for the
>> case study, T-MPLS. This is a fact. That is why it is extremely
>> important to have such a document and indicates the harm that may be
>> created. 
>> And I agree with Huub, now we should focus on a good conceptual work.
>> Best regards,
>> Nurit
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-tp-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of ext Rolf Winter
>> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:24 AM
>> To: hhelvoort@chello.nl
>> Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] poll to
>> makedraft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-03.txtaworking group document
>>
>> But you have seen that it might directly become a historical 
>> RFC, right
>> :) Ok, I see both your and Nurit's point. But then the IAB draft seems
>> to me to really have a trivial message which is: "If you work on the
>> same thing talk to each other". Which is probably fine. I concur.
>>
>> 	Rolf
>>
>>
>> NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road,
>> London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 
>>  
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Huub van Helvoort [mailto:hhelvoort@chello.nl]
>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2009 10:04
>>> To: Rolf Winter
>>> Cc: mpls-tp@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] poll to makedraft-andersson-mpls-tp-process-
>>> 03.txt aworking group document
>>>
>>> Hi Rolf,
>>>
>>> You wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is an alternative for this draft I believe, at least for its
>>>> content. The IAB seems to be in love with how the whole MPLS-TP
>>>> process is working
>>>>
>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iab-mpls-tp-uncoord-harmful). Good
>>>> for them but they fail to mention how the overall process 
>> is working
>>>> in practice. I'd propose to merge the two. I fail to see 
>> why we need
>>>> a document that praises the process and another one describing it.
>>> I do not agree with you, the draft above is a hysterical document
>>> describing what happened before the JWT was created, and
>>> draft-andersson-mpls-tp-process describes the current process as
>>> agreed by the JWT.
>>> We should concentrate on current mode of operation and not waste
>>> precious time on history.
>>>
>>> Regards, Huub.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ================================================================
>>> Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls-tp mailing list
>> mpls-tp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls-tp mailing list
>> mpls-tp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp
> 

-- 
================================================================
                   http://www.van-helvoort.eu/
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...