Re: [mpls] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01

Hi,

1) section 5.1 - "At each endpoint a tunnel is uniquely identified by the Source Node_ID and a locally assigned tunnel number."
   a) Should "Source" be replaced by the "endpoint's" since later the "Dst-Node_ID" is used?
   b) Useful to clarify the scope of "uniquely identified" before this statement. 
   C) Should there be a similar identifier at each intermediate node besides the endpoints?

2) Section 5.2 - Does any LSR own the "LSP_num" space? If so pls state that.

Thanks

- Sri

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:33 PM
> To: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01
> 
> All,
> 
> this is to start an MPLS working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01
> 
> There is a discussion on the OAM model for MS-PWs where we 
> haven't been able to come to conclusion. Once we reach 
> agreement the document will be updated. Comments in this area 
> are welcome during the working group last call.
> 
> 
> Please send your comments to the mpls-tp@ietf.org mailing list.
> 
> The working group last ends eob April 2nd.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> --
> 
> Loa Andersson
> 
> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager
> Ericsson ///
>    phone:  +46 10 717 52 13
>            +46 767 72 92 13
> 
>    email:  loa.andersson@ericsson.com
>            loa@pi.nu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 