Re: [mpls] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01

"Shahram Davari" <davari@broadcom.com> Fri, 12 March 2010 00:27 UTC

Return-Path: <davari@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586243A6849; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:27:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMs6xgPDZkTN; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MMS3.broadcom.com (mms3.broadcom.com [216.31.210.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8C33A6822; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.16.192.232] by MMS3.broadcom.com with ESMTP (Broadcom SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.2)); Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:27:34 -0800
X-Server-Uuid: B55A25B1-5D7D-41F8-BC53-C57E7AD3C201
Received: from SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([10.16.192.130]) by SJEXCHHUB02.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([10.16.192.232]) with mapi; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:27:34 -0800
From: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:27:32 -0800
Thread-Topic: [mpls] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01
Thread-Index: AcrBczT1LsEVDiSwTX2v9QSMrvpjyAAA7NaQ
Message-ID: <2C2F1EBA8050E74EA81502D5740B4BD68171AE5BF5@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References: <97ea8a23065211ee6df8f08ea5e4ba67.squirrel@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <97ea8a23065211ee6df8f08ea5e4ba67.squirrel@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-WSS-ID: 678755FC31G56992480-01-01
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [mpls] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:27:42 -0000

Hi,

Couple of comments:

1) Why the Interface_ID is 32-bit while the Tunnel_ID is 16-bit? Do we need to support more interfaces than tunnels? 
2) The draft defines the Global_Tunnel_ID as:
      Src-Global_ID::Src-Node_ID::Src-Tunnel_Num:: Dst-Global_ID::Dst-Node_ID::Dst-Tunnel_Num

This seems to define a bidirectional tunnel. Is that the intent? If so please clarify. If not then why Dst-Global_ID::Dst-Node_ID::Dst-Tunnel_Num is needed?

3) Is section 5.2 talking about unidirectional LSP or bidirectional LSP?
4) Section 7.1.2.1 says:
	Since a MEG pertains to a single MPLS-TP Tunnel, IP compatible MEG_IDs for MPLS-TP Tunnels are simply the corresponding Tunnel_IDs

Assuming the Tunnel_ID is a unidirectional ID, then this statement implies that for the reverse direction a different MEG_ID is required. Is that the intent? If so why?

5) Why are drafts part of the normative references?

6) Will section 8 (open issues) be removed before publishing? This section implies that the MEP and MIP definition is not yet aligned with framework?

Regards,
Shahram



-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:33 PM
To: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01

All,

this is to start an MPLS working group last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01

There is a discussion on the OAM model for MS-PWs where we haven't been
able to come to conclusion. Once we reach agreement the document will
be updated. Comments in this area are welcome during the working group
last call.


Please send your comments to the mpls-tp@ietf.org mailing list.

The working group last ends eob April 2nd.

/Loa

--

Loa Andersson

Sr Strategy and Standards Manager
Ericsson ///
   phone:  +46 10 717 52 13
           +46 767 72 92 13

   email:  loa.andersson@ericsson.com
           loa@pi.nu




_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls