Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01

George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com> Tue, 27 April 2010 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <swallow@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370DD28C138; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lVOcQDPKBYiE; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22E33A69AC; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAOLA1kutJV2a/2dsb2JhbACcTnGnHJofAoUMBA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,282,1270425600"; d="scan'208";a="105598920"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Apr 2010 17:51:11 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3RHpAAK022590; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:51:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-106.cisco.com ([72.163.62.148]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:51:10 -0500
Received: from 10.98.32.165 ([10.98.32.165]) by XMB-RCD-106.cisco.com ([72.163.62.148]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:51:10 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:51:08 -0400
From: George Swallow <swallow@cisco.com>
To: Sriganesh Kini <sriganesh.kini@ericsson.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-tp@ietf.org" <mpls-tp@ietf.org>, "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C7FC9C4C.247D9%swallow@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [mpls-tp] [mpls] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01
Thread-Index: AcrBc0WnZb3W+AQWTpuJTuXgXymZDgQ8Q2QwBPN49pE=
In-Reply-To: <5A5E55DF96F73844AF7DFB0F48721F0F52E4835FCC@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2010 17:51:10.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[389877F0:01CAE632]
Subject: Re: [mpls] [mpls-tp] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:51:28 -0000

Sri -

See inline:


On 4/2/10 9:11 AM, "Sriganesh Kini" <sriganesh.kini@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 1) section 5.1 - "At each endpoint a tunnel is uniquely identified by the
> Source Node_ID and a locally assigned tunnel number."
>    a) Should "Source" be replaced by the "endpoint's" since later the
> "Dst-Node_ID" is used?

Agree - will make change.

>    b) Useful to clarify the scope of "uniquely identified" before this
> statement. 

Will do my best.

>    C) Should there be a similar identifier at each intermediate node besides
> the endpoints?

The midpoints need to have this (not a similar) identifier too.  Either
through configuration or through signaling.
 
> 2) Section 5.2 - Does any LSR own the "LSP_num" space? If so pls state that.

In the provisioned case, it would be the provisioning system.  In the
signaled case, the end that initiates the signaling.

...George

> Thanks
> 
> - Sri
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Loa Andersson
>> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:33 PM
>> To: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-tp@ietf.org; pwe3@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.org
>> Subject: [mpls] mpls wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> this is to start an MPLS working group last call on
>> draft-ietf-mpls-tp-identifiers-01
>> 
>> There is a discussion on the OAM model for MS-PWs where we
>> haven't been able to come to conclusion. Once we reach
>> agreement the document will be updated. Comments in this area
>> are welcome during the working group last call.
>> 
>> 
>> Please send your comments to the mpls-tp@ietf.org mailing list.
>> 
>> The working group last ends eob April 2nd.
>> 
>> /Loa
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Loa Andersson
>> 
>> Sr Strategy and Standards Manager
>> Ericsson ///
>>    phone:  +46 10 717 52 13
>>            +46 767 72 92 13
>> 
>>    email:  loa.andersson@ericsson.com
>>            loa@pi.nu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls-tp mailing list
> mpls-tp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls-tp