Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 06 September 2022 19:31 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506CEC1522CC; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 12:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BTYKWNrSJ7Mq; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 12:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ED66C14CE34; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 12:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id u18so6604237lfo.8; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 12:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Gc3vibdSBDF5EPBIxQAK2Y7xUuz9yTxy/2yNRcSgH34=; b=B5l7lpA9f+RTMBikENEXegyyUdrXWjHRA2FUd+N5TFcMmA0M+Jy4xHRgJ7E3D7AZ2L nZny601DkEw7Rre18flYB3xgcj/n7YoOsHnmX+4BDXYK0MJuNBycqsNM77C0ur+onP6I URdAG1tjFlxvETiLgETpqnC37vZOtWqw/2Z3RTKRfUs4oiT5jxZTF8yAg1rz883YSeNg p29uzy+EsS4OZD6MqYJtwVktj66Pzia0aMo/e9xL10RY4T5e64E3054a3lKqOZ8vY7CJ hyYMRVH1pSnCsWotxRD5rmCtYDH8U3xZZC6qpy1EjLD7azGxPZY542jLW22pAiXhm/jP JQjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Gc3vibdSBDF5EPBIxQAK2Y7xUuz9yTxy/2yNRcSgH34=; b=tBZ7aoXP3DrGiRvLF7tHT4szsDLSexyQHmbMYjoplmJLzFl/jJSN0tfu6iggfC4KPN cnVlDKoZAo3Qzgb3NHXQe2HlUwkbV9bP0UG8Yyik4zboNzkMlRgjY5RxYTS787/Rr8ia zXONb2kaU1QnEQPaXK10KnV8emaayby9LUIBWJv9EjYs6F27/hBvQHkKyINM7JZ0ZuGU SzF/BwtsWXTCugyym4+UtoLKdqDn/BHa3ADGcixtj+iqRoW+U8tKppSx1XyVU3Jz1bt8 xPoPL3PMD0PznSKI9a3LnNd4aimJ+oKXYyTkUYOyb41grknrG/9ubyo08zI9JsaHXzu/ bJOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1hB6WY6Yr1SUABISsTBqBofNBRuinCBePEg+0Uc+qiNniHt0iN ooalZK8vEvDnO8Hj8DSpVF0c/DoEFRj7XzBUZn4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7KWtyJGYCtfcRoQ67VGmP6+fQDnsA6VbFR84S4OsLAUri5rM5m/KBdXtmSeGV6ItrC860j+00o9Izs48KBQKA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31c6:b0:48b:2771:d0d2 with SMTP id j6-20020a05651231c600b0048b2771d0d2mr17468258lfe.382.1662492662020; Tue, 06 Sep 2022 12:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7c419233-7cba-1bb0-740d-34e09f149efe@pi.nu> <DS0PR19MB650143C4F4C1B9BF3E60C888FC7A9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <bc67ab72-e36c-cd5f-27aa-0441c4ee093c@pi.nu> <DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 21:30:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXGs591VQudQL4jQ-hFkmT58acd8oMTOp3BZbVNYqovfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008fbf2a05e8073cf6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/i6EvRC9ClbHJdfRoDmdJ89I9O08>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 19:31:06 -0000
Hi Tarek, et al., Option A - I support the MPLS Open DT bringing forward a single unified solution Regards, Greg On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 8:50 PM Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear MPLS WG and MPLS Open DT, > > > > Over the past months, the MPLS Open DT has reviewed several proposals for > the packet encodings for the MNA solution. > > A compilation of the multiple solutions brought forward is present at > https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/MNADocumnets. > > > > We believe that currently there are two alternative ways to progress the > MNA solution. > > One of them requires a single unified solution, and the other allows for > individual solutions to progress independently. > > We expect any unified solution to document the pieces from the presented > solutions that are discussed and agreed upon in the weekly MPLS Open DT > meeting. > > The co-chairs for the working groups hosting the Open MPLS DT are polling > the WG on their preference to move forward. > > Please respond with either: > > A) “I support the MPLS Open DT bringing forward a single unified > solution" > > OR > B) “I support progressing the individual solution(s) independently" > > > > We will allow this poll to run for two weeks (ending on Sept 19th). > > > > Regards, > > Tarek (for the MPLS Open DT co-chairs) > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >
- [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Gyan Mishra
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jisu Bhattacharya (jisu)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jisu Bhattacharya (jisu)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Zafar Ali (zali)
- [mpls] Poll results (was: Poll on way forward for… Tarek Saad