Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 07 September 2022 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9526C157B3A; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LmdFOQ-WWVfa; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E84BC157B35; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id d12so15356179plr.6; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 10:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=keiJqfZr75VEYQXRgmMrNlCqrtrnSOn2IzhECvez2gY=; b=hksguDb5og7LOThGXtJgtHpJ4OlA0uRZASqw589eoWYVQBdeiGcHUU6AzPvZ5+zpKW 4v9rJU6csCl7up2iICJ9+MjXfDM71swzZ0+MJKoE0+LaU4NK36+BPIrO1MUaPHPHLvcV MMLVHMYmiiBPqtZIZhtBLn1KtpkJHQ1U4WrgY9r3AbnEt8b4VPoev2evCYLqtlF8MYjT hOn1j/YUEXuLaQ+b8iCY8yusajoxnprBoMQB/gIvQkdVjW6MXwnAfBzU0xwqOf9Pd2oq E6v1ffTMiuiKdYybFO4a/7d0IhRcgcZBqS+9kQ1Z1uaCYvRj8/03N2mQfBi3Zu8wZ/qO 6j4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date; bh=keiJqfZr75VEYQXRgmMrNlCqrtrnSOn2IzhECvez2gY=; b=T0WmdUZgEZj6dijKi6py+hLZIh27cf24rrIrcWAWZ4uIL8bT8vEgixDdPhE+TjwMu0 /5lR74Hm42OfjsGZ39iG2ASVs407ish/jBYiUJIDsaxoUvTBA13OEWESG2e37uK9sh0E tgJAm4f9tXhYE2Y1L3RU5Ou2SXJ3hGQk/+atv0QluFHfHMUMCLCuwx6Mn62WklmFUb1v sKLADrJkwl6fZufBFXxhz3aNsINcBfYH+1jernxH2doWf6gNvJMeSz0FWofgZ4FGP2Gq M8MkKpBkQE0TFalCub9+ZgWX2QTa4jFyVhcbFZlmykFN/gIAlCdkKzmEhnIeQOUDPQ9/ FRZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1796MEfsYz0G+bi9aMMZCFIxbEx6j2zZMsxnSahOZ2iPDtvC/C 34X8cHV4bK0h0fl++zQRtU+CNqJaCw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4kyG48wUv5fFr21f2njqkBskw23TCcfXHyWf0k45O5Hkx0VkgpFZS3YxQZqz3TkxCA9TBZ/Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1803:b0:1fb:45e2:5d85 with SMTP id lw3-20020a17090b180300b001fb45e25d85mr32347102pjb.163.1662573563361; Wed, 07 Sep 2022 10:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:646:9702:c61:81c7:71f5:7eba:aea6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p18-20020a170902e75200b0016c574aa0fdsm12801946plf.76.2022.09.07.10.59.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 07 Sep 2022 10:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 10:59:20 -0700
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <01964C67-A3AB-44CB-BE62-62D2C929C112@gmail.com>
References: <7c419233-7cba-1bb0-740d-34e09f149efe@pi.nu> <DS0PR19MB650143C4F4C1B9BF3E60C888FC7A9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <bc67ab72-e36c-cd5f-27aa-0441c4ee093c@pi.nu> <DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/j7hOnt4fHsbmH-2O6C5iSubnJX0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 17:59:24 -0000

I support option A, “A single unified solution”.

Thanks,
Yingzhen