Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Wed, 07 September 2022 01:48 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEA9C14CF1C; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.805
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.805 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1oS_plvGSN4s; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944CDC14F725; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 18:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.207]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MMlRd0GtBz67Mww; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:44:29 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemi100016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.123) by fraeml707-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 03:48:31 +0200
Received: from kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.110) by kwepemi100016.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:48:29 +0800
Received: from kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.110]) by kwepemi500017.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.110]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 09:48:29 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll on way forward for MNA solution
Thread-Index: AQHYwiGADMn7dxeBrU+s8T0Dsgrhra3SykBQgAAIGZGAAFc4UA==
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 01:48:29 +0000
Message-ID: <64ca0f9728a44b6b98a9bb2488f520d7@huawei.com>
References: <7c419233-7cba-1bb0-740d-34e09f149efe@pi.nu> <DS0PR19MB650143C4F4C1B9BF3E60C888FC7A9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <bc67ab72-e36c-cd5f-27aa-0441c4ee093c@pi.nu> <DS0PR19MB65019CECC654037542FC2588FC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <BY3PR05MB8081BDD61CBD32C12574F53EC77E9@BY3PR05MB8081.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <DS0PR19MB65013068664D0FA8B8DE958FFC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR19MB65013068664D0FA8B8DE958FFC7E9@DS0PR19MB6501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.112.40.66]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_64ca0f9728a44b6b98a9bb2488f520d7huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/j_TGEvWp0lHGl7WobmYy9I69j9g>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 01:48:41 -0000
Hi Tarek, Thanks for your clarification. While my reading of the two options listed in this clarification are different from the two options in the poll. The original poll is about whether the WG should allow to progress one single solution or multiple solutions for MNA. This clarification mail is talking about how the WG/DT produces one single solution. Either creating a new document to combine the different features (ISD, PSD, etc.) from the existing documents, or move forward the different features (ISD, PSD, etc.) in separate existing documents in parallel. IMO both approaches could result in a single complete solution. Thus it would be necessary for the chairs to clarify what this poll really is about. Best regards, Jie From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tarek Saad Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 4:11 AM To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>; mpls@ietf.org Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org; pals-chairs@ietf.org; DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Thanks, John, for responding to the poll. Nope, nothing covered in fine print there.. A) will allow Open DT to collaborate on the single unified solution in a new document (consequently, aborting individual documents/solutions) B) will allow features of the MNA solution (as present in some of current proposals) to progress independently. Regards, Tarek From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net<mailto:jdrake@juniper.net>> Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 at 3:32 PM To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com<mailto:tsaad.net@gmail.com>>, mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org> <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org> <mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>>, pals-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:pals-chairs@ietf.org> <pals-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:pals-chairs@ietf.org>>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:detnet-chairs@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek, I support A). (Is this a trick question?) Yours Irrespectively, John Juniper Business Use Only From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Tarek Saad Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 2:50 PM To: mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org> Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:mpls-chairs@ietf.org>; pals-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:pals-chairs@ietf.org>; DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:detnet-chairs@ietf.org>> Subject: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution [External Email. Be cautious of content] Dear MPLS WG and MPLS Open DT, Over the past months, the MPLS Open DT has reviewed several proposals for the packet encodings for the MNA solution. A compilation of the multiple solutions brought forward is present at https://trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/MNADocumnets<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/trac.ietf.org/trac/mpls/wiki/MNADocumnets__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!Dfvl0984HcYdOJHJZPmFsLUCzY3oC_ev_CkBwZ-68tsxKXnVMejCmWVyK8_VZ_M8dH90qFEcU0IVSDfikg$>. We believe that currently there are two alternative ways to progress the MNA solution. One of them requires a single unified solution, and the other allows for individual solutions to progress independently. We expect any unified solution to document the pieces from the presented solutions that are discussed and agreed upon in the weekly MPLS Open DT meeting. The co-chairs for the working groups hosting the Open MPLS DT are polling the WG on their preference to move forward. Please respond with either: A) "I support the MPLS Open DT bringing forward a single unified solution" OR B) "I support progressing the individual solution(s) independently" We will allow this poll to run for two weeks (ending on Sept 19th). Regards, Tarek (for the MPLS Open DT co-chairs)
- [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Huub van Helvoort
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tarek Saad
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Haoyu Song
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Gyan Mishra
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jisu Bhattacharya (jisu)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jaganbabu Rajamanickam
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Jisu Bhattacharya (jisu)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution bruno.decraene
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Poll on way forward for MNA solution Zafar Ali (zali)
- [mpls] Poll results (was: Poll on way forward for… Tarek Saad