IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning

Camilo Cardona <juancamilo.cardona@imdea.org> Mon, 22 May 2023 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <juancamilo.cardona@imdea.org>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683BEC15109D; Mon, 22 May 2023 10:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=imdea.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6UGRZ1BBEsOu; Mon, 22 May 2023 10:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.imdea.org (mail.imdea.org [185.195.99.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBADDC15153E; Mon, 22 May 2023 10:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Arachnida
X-Arachnida-Id: 9C8A8C84
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=imdea.org; s=arachnida; t=1684777421; h=From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=f9JtLjMtNcxnuw01Ch+VRS05dULpoPjkhorkpIP6f7I=; b=QABn9wBVEStIyDbb04Rg3JRR1wGy+V8GbWDkV/FmfCvGastbGofkXQStpU2d1p7CcFFMpO0a xpaUUe3QVkf01MshBYe9jsO2IVvpoA24XiGpWRBaBmdjj1+3Tlif3us/rXs13AG8qyvCyUPY6wT Ujg8t8ZyMvxl9XZm/kT9iF/aUtzUKgmK9PDGKuBeBnjnM1+j6/8l1Dxzg34o6O4kGbVYWCQ06Um diGMqi4InB6ZsP/wfCXmZE/eI2wmDhFl9Mys0rwRq1t+94chU92RldgY6toHIfqyk7GyyONyX5e EKr+l72A6sBHeZ3UZ05T5S1PqPL9HsL8A2RoqJsECfGAw==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [191.88.152.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: juancamilo.cardona@imdea.org) by mail.imdea.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C8A8C84; Mon, 22 May 2023 19:43:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Camilo Cardona <juancamilo.cardona@imdea.org>
Message-Id: <AC6138B1-ADA3-4D27-959A-47053D195914@imdea.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2021EB76-8D96-4243-BA36-2605589D8C96"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 12:43:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <E78B3C0B-B415-4E8C-9080-ADFB69D4464E@gmail.com>
Cc: netconf <netconf@ietf.org>, netconf-chairs <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
References: <E78B3C0B-B415-4E8C-9080-ADFB69D4464E@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.500.231)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/4UUxXMoSJCLQsqh09F0DT2Ztl-A>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 17:43:53 -0000

Hello all,

I support the continuation of this work within the WG.

A significant portion of this discussion revolves around determining the most effective approach for handling multiple, non-backwards compatible, yang versions.
In my opinion, versioning is needed in YANG, and we must find ways to live with multiple model versions. I'm uncertain if this is the ideal solution, but personally, I don't see any harm in allowing the WG to continue working on it and making a decision at a later stage.

A couple of points:
- The abstract of the draft requires some editing.
- As Andy pointed out, the draft needs examples.
- I like the insights shared by Jürgen and Andy regarding how hacky versioning is for YANG 1.1. It makes sense, but I guess nobody wants to start a 1.2 project..

Thanks,
Camilo C


> On 15 May 2023, at 15:42, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> This is start of a two week poll on making draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03 a working group
> document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support” or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations
> with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> The poll ends May 31.
> 
> Mahesh and Kent (as co-chairs)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email