Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning

[Jürgen Schönwälder <[e-mail]>]

So here we go. The change from (module, path) names to (module, path,
version) names will trigger a series of followup works, like this one.
Adding version numbers to how we name things is a fundamental change
of YANG and its protocols (and people still pretend this change can be
done without even changing the YANG version number).

I doubt that fixing things piecewise is the right strategy but I fear
this is where the IETF is heading. The result will likely look like
some patchwork glued together by some implementation specific bits and
pieces.

/js

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 01:42:14PM -0700, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> All,
> 
> This is start of a two week poll on making draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning-03 a working group
> document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support” or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations
> with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> 
> The poll ends May 31.
> 
> Mahesh and Kent (as co-chairs)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> netconf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf


-- 
Jürgen Schönwälder              Constructor University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   [phone]         <https://constructor.university/>