IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning

Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com Sat, 20 May 2023 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477A5C151539; Sat, 20 May 2023 07:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I82Sxb-OLynM; Sat, 20 May 2023 07:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.swisscom.com (mailout120.swisscom.com [138.188.166.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BEC5C151536; Sat, 20 May 2023 07:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.swisscom.com; Sat, 20 May 2023 16:52:48 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="----=_Part_753418_764702431.1684594368457"
From: Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com
To: jschoenwaelder@constructor.university
CC: netconf@ietf.org, netconf-chairs@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [netconf] Adoption poll for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning
Thread-Index: AQHZh23IuM+nwy2VMEajSbCUpQutFq9d6McAgAAH4QCAAAX0gIAAD86AgACSwICAAtszYIABRIQAgACMJEA=
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 14:52:46 +0000
Message-ID: <e6a2bf59c4d34763aa1604b4f1edd63b@swisscom.com>
References: <E78B3C0B-B415-4E8C-9080-ADFB69D4464E@gmail.com> <AM8PR06MB776465A8890FA1FF944F7249957E9@AM8PR06MB7764.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <fxqbpxqt4uddzynsqu7nrphks4ffdbcet2s4mzgq5kjybc7h5r@34fjvmua6eva> <AM8PR06MB77647944C3C804FB22E38B50957E9@AM8PR06MB7764.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <ibonfs57tsr2ymul4wsns5jhpoiofkciz7zw27udzixtt7olrx@zh5p3tjohxoo> <CABCOCHRmnOw_Tex1ixcyA=bjdHptHVyQ1nN1UKOfyC9nPqdxpQ@mail.gmail.com> <1d7ff7ee90cb441f843b460bdb216ff2@swisscom.com> <5jp4433v7oblvv2kowtntbiemvuyle3vtqc523drm4pchkn3d4@in2khsya6sw4>
In-Reply-To: <5jp4433v7oblvv2kowtntbiemvuyle3vtqc523drm4pchkn3d4@in2khsya6sw4>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-CH
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_SetDate=2023-05-20T14:52:43Z; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_Name=C2 Internal; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_SiteId=364e5b87-c1c7-420d-9bee-c35d19b557a1; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_ActionId=da4184f2-27b2-4118-bb2c-3f2bd1db0328; MSIP_Label_2e1fccfb-80ca-4fe1-a574-1516544edb53_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [138.188.161.184]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mailer: Totemo_TrustMail_(Notification)
X-Trustmail: processed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/90hVfC2IOPT9STRiJrtvnJ270oE>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 14:52:59 -0000

Dear Jürgen,

No I dont. The sentence refers to semantic changes described in Section 11 of RFC 7950. 

Thanks, I will add this in -04 version as it clarifies what semantic changes are and why they demand a new revision.

Best wishes
Thomas

-----Original Message-----
From: Jürgen Schönwälder <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university> 
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2023 10:25 AM
To: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-VNC-HCS <Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com>
Cc: netconf@ietf.org; netconf-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netconf] Adoption poll for draft-tgraf-netconf-yang-notifications-versioning

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:05:29AM +0000, Thomas.Graf@swisscom.com wrote:
> 
> The semantics can change between different YANG module revisions.
>

Which 'semantics can change'? Do you refer to something not covered by RFC 7950 section 11?

/js

-- 
Jürgen Schönwälder              Constructor University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://constructor.university/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email