Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77

Hi Raj,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
> Sent: Tuesday, 09 March, 2010 4:46 PM
> To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
> Cc: netext@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
> 
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> 
> On 3/9/10 3:35 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Raj,
> >
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 22:15 +0100, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/9/10 12:29 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano"
> <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Raj,
> >>>
> >>> I'ld like to ask why there are slots assigned to drafts that do
> address
> >>> any WG charter item, while draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01
> >>> which addresses one of the charter items:
> >>
> >> Which specific slots are you refering to?
> >> A. The radius extensions for PMIP6 is part of the WG after
> rechartering.
> >> This work has been transferred from Netlmm to Netext
> >> B. The localized routing I-D is the baseline from which we work on
> the
> >> solution and LR is within the scope of the charter
> >> C. ITHO is now part of the charter and I have just included Yokota's
> I-D to
> >> initiate the discussion.
> >
> > As far as I understand Yokota's ID is a particular solution (nothing
> > against it), while we are chartered to work on:
> >
> > - Informational applicability statement that analyzes the issues
> > involved with this approach and characterizes the contexts in which
> > such use is or is not appropriate.
> >
> > Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
> > Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
> >
> > This is exactly what our draft tries to discuss, so I think this is
> also
> > a good draft to trigger the discussion. Once this is clear, we'll
> have
> > to think on particular solutions (the virtual interface is one of the
> > possible ones).
> 
> Let me revisit the agenda and also take a look at your I-D and see what
> to
> do. Basically the fancy wording in the milestone refers to the use of a
> virtual interface for supporting ITHO.

Obviously, your interpretation of the fancy wording is not shared by all members of the group.

> 
> But thanks for keeping the chairs honest :)
>

No problem. We'll do our best ;)

Jc

> 
> 
> -Raj
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >>
> >> The I-Ds may be individual at the moment but the work itself is very
> much
> >> within WG charter. We will have WG I-Ds (hopefully) on these topics
> at the
> >> next meeting.
> >>
> >> -Raj
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
> >>> Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
> >>>
> >>> is on the "if time permits" list.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Carlos
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 19:20 +0100, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
> >>>> Rev: 01
> >>>>
> >>>> Network-Based Mobility Extensions WG meeting
> >>>> THURSDAY, March 25, 2010
> >>>> 1300-1500 Afternoon Session I (Redondo)
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Logistics (Bluesheets, minutes takers, jabber, agenda bashing)
> 5 mins
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. WG status update          Chairs        5 Mins
> >>>>
> >>>> 3. Runtime LMA selection I-D update   Jouni Korhonen     10 Mins
> >>>>    I-D: draft-ietf-netext-redirect-01
> >>>>
> >>>> 4. Bulk re-reg I-D update and next steps    Fuad Junior   10 Mins
> >>>>    I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00
> >>>>
> >>>> 5. Radius extensions for PMIP6     Frank Xia       5 Mins
> >>>>    I-D: draft-xia-netext-radius-00
> >>>>
> >>>> 5. Localized routing solution discussion    Suresh K.       20
> Mins
> >>>>    I-D: draft-krishnan-netext-pmip-lr-01
> >>>>
> >>>> 6. Flow mobility for PMIP6: Solution approaches  Chairs lead
> discussion
> >>>>    20 Mins
> >>>>    We will consider the various I-Ds that have proposed solutions
> for
> >>>>    flow mobility. Please send a one slide summary of your I-D and
> >>>>    solution proposal to : netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> >>>>
> >>>> 7. Inter-tech HO with PMIP6   Hidetoshi Yokota      15 Mins
> >>>>    I-D:  draft-yokota-netlmm-pmipv6-mn-itho-support-03
> >>>>    We will also discuss the scope of the inter-technology handover
> >>>>    work that needs to be undertaken in the WG.
> >>>>
> >>>> 8. Next steps       Chairs        5 Mins
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Time permitting we will consider the following I-Ds:
> >>>>
> >>>> (i)  draft-hong-netext-hybrid-hnp-01            Yong-Geun
> >>>> (ii) draft-jeyatharan-netext-pmip-dormant-binding-v00   M.
> Jeyatharan
> >>>> (iii) draft-chan-netext-distributed-lma-03   Anthony Chan
> >>>> (iv) draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01    Carlos Cano
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> netext mailing list
> >>>> netext@ietf.org
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
> >>> GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
> >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext