Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77

"MELIA TELEMACO" <Telemaco.Melia@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 10 March 2010 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <Telemaco.Melia@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D25D3A684F for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:36:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GW10FUsjACPl for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:36:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail6.alcatel.fr (smail6.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E003A684E for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:36:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRVELSBHS05.ad2.ad.alcatel.com (frvelsbhs05.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [155.132.6.77]) by smail6.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id o2AHaFLv003654; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:36:16 +0100
Received: from FRVELSMBS14.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.32]) by FRVELSBHS05.ad2.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:36:15 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:36:14 +0100
Message-ID: <853DD750D9C3724FBF2DF7164FCF641C043797EE@FRVELSMBS14.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7BC5722.5C2E%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
Thread-Index: Acq/0G/CoUFvhnU4TDaq3DufgDxlXAAAYDmLAABjCzAACCkLdgAg4qfA
References: <D60519DB022FFA48974A25955FFEC08C02E23549@SAM.InterDigital.com> <C7BC5722.5C2E%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
From: MELIA TELEMACO <Telemaco.Melia@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com, JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com, cjbc@it.uc3m.es
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Mar 2010 17:36:15.0994 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F8E3DA0:01CAC078]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.84
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:36:16 -0000

Raj,

Although not covered yet in this version of the ID we have preliminary results on the matter. We will be happy to share them during the slot.

telemaco

-----Message d'origine-----
De : netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
Envoyé : mercredi 10 mars 2010 02:51
À : JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com; cjbc@it.uc3m.es
Cc : netext@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77


Carlos,

I took a look at the I-D: draft-bernardos-netext-ll-statement-01. Thanks for
writing it. We can use this document  to discuss the milestone included in
the WG charter. 

In terms of the applicability section, I was wondering if you had any
analysis on how the various approaches could be considered for specifically
addressing ITHO and flow mobility while factoring in whether a specific
technique would require changes to the host and if so at what layer.

I have updated the agenda (
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/netext.txt) which includes the
discussion of this milestone.

Rgds,
-Raj



On 3/9/10 3:59 PM, "ext Zuniga, Juan Carlos"
<JuanCarlos.Zuniga@InterDigital.com> wrote:

> Hi Raj,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, 09 March, 2010 4:46 PM
>> To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
>> Cc: netext@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Carlos,
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/9/10 3:35 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Raj,
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 22:15 +0100, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/9/10 12:29 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano"
>> <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Raj,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'ld like to ask why there are slots assigned to drafts that do
>> address
>>>>> any WG charter item, while draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01
>>>>> which addresses one of the charter items:
>>>> 
>>>> Which specific slots are you refering to?
>>>> A. The radius extensions for PMIP6 is part of the WG after
>> rechartering.
>>>> This work has been transferred from Netlmm to Netext
>>>> B. The localized routing I-D is the baseline from which we work on
>> the
>>>> solution and LR is within the scope of the charter
>>>> C. ITHO is now part of the charter and I have just included Yokota's
>> I-D to
>>>> initiate the discussion.
>>> 
>>> As far as I understand Yokota's ID is a particular solution (nothing
>>> against it), while we are chartered to work on:
>>> 
>>> - Informational applicability statement that analyzes the issues
>>> involved with this approach and characterizes the contexts in which
>>> such use is or is not appropriate.
>>> 
>>> Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
>>> Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
>>> 
>>> This is exactly what our draft tries to discuss, so I think this is
>> also
>>> a good draft to trigger the discussion. Once this is clear, we'll
>> have
>>> to think on particular solutions (the virtual interface is one of the
>>> possible ones).
>> 
>> Let me revisit the agenda and also take a look at your I-D and see what
>> to
>> do. Basically the fancy wording in the milestone refers to the use of a
>> virtual interface for supporting ITHO.
> 
> Obviously, your interpretation of the fancy wording is not shared by all
> members of the group.
> 
>> 
>> But thanks for keeping the chairs honest :)
>> 
> 
> No problem. We'll do our best ;)
> 
> Jc
> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Raj
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Carlos
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The I-Ds may be individual at the moment but the work itself is very
>> much
>>>> within WG charter. We will have WG I-Ds (hopefully) on these topics
>> at the
>>>> next meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> -Raj
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
>>>>> Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
>>>>> 
>>>>> is on the "if time permits" list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Carlos
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 19:20 +0100, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
>>>>>> Rev: 01
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Network-Based Mobility Extensions WG meeting
>>>>>> THURSDAY, March 25, 2010
>>>>>> 1300-1500 Afternoon Session I (Redondo)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1. Logistics (Bluesheets, minutes takers, jabber, agenda bashing)
>> 5 mins
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2. WG status update          Chairs        5 Mins
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 3. Runtime LMA selection I-D update   Jouni Korhonen     10 Mins
>>>>>>    I-D: draft-ietf-netext-redirect-01
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 4. Bulk re-reg I-D update and next steps    Fuad Junior   10 Mins
>>>>>>    I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 5. Radius extensions for PMIP6     Frank Xia       5 Mins
>>>>>>    I-D: draft-xia-netext-radius-00
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 5. Localized routing solution discussion    Suresh K.       20
>> Mins
>>>>>>    I-D: draft-krishnan-netext-pmip-lr-01
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 6. Flow mobility for PMIP6: Solution approaches  Chairs lead
>> discussion
>>>>>>    20 Mins
>>>>>>    We will consider the various I-Ds that have proposed solutions
>> for
>>>>>>    flow mobility. Please send a one slide summary of your I-D and
>>>>>>    solution proposal to : netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 7. Inter-tech HO with PMIP6   Hidetoshi Yokota      15 Mins
>>>>>>    I-D:  draft-yokota-netlmm-pmipv6-mn-itho-support-03
>>>>>>    We will also discuss the scope of the inter-technology handover
>>>>>>    work that needs to be undertaken in the WG.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 8. Next steps       Chairs        5 Mins
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Time permitting we will consider the following I-Ds:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (i)  draft-hong-netext-hybrid-hnp-01            Yong-Geun
>>>>>> (ii) draft-jeyatharan-netext-pmip-dormant-binding-v00   M.
>> Jeyatharan
>>>>>> (iii) draft-chan-netext-distributed-lma-03   Anthony Chan
>>>>>> (iv) draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01    Carlos Cano
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> netext mailing list
>>>>>> netext@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
>>>>> GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
>>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netext mailing list
>> netext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext

_______________________________________________
netext mailing list
netext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext