IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77

"Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com> Tue, 09 March 2010 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <julienl@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232683A68F7 for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:12:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uyXccUo1Pn7e for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:12:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C004E3A68F3 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:12:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=julienl@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1268176348; x=1299712348; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; z=From:=20"Laganier,=20Julien"=20<julienl@qualcomm.com> |To:=20"Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com"=20<Basavaraj.Patil@nok ia.com>,=20"cjbc@it.uc3m.es"=0D=0A=09<cjbc@it.uc3m.es> |CC:=20"netext@ietf.org"=20<netext@ietf.org>|Date:=20Tue, =209=20Mar=202010=2015:12:03=20-0800|Subject:=20RE:=20[ne text]=20Draft=20agenda=20of=20WG=20meeting=20at=20IETF77 |Thread-Topic:=20[netext]=20Draft=20agenda=20of=20WG=20me eting=20at=20IETF77|Thread-Index:=20Acq/0G/CoUFvhnU4TDaq3 DufgDxlXAAAYDmLAAK7ChA=3D|Message-ID:=20<BF345F63074F8040 B58C00A186FCA57F1C6A8C452B@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> |References:=20<1268170553.3674.38.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.e s>=0D=0A=20<C7BC1DC6.5BFE%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> |In-Reply-To:=20<C7BC1DC6.5BFE%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> |Accept-Language:=20en-US|Content-Language:=20en-US |X-MS-Has-Attach:|X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:|acceptlanguage: =20en-US|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"iso-8 859-1"|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=iN/8zWl3OT9hY5ccTxwTls5vEia5RWh8NCkL0K7spgE=; b=U2Ch2gCtBQ2vD7/nr9XBPxbcVU+VzXnI68B0KH/0uIhMuRJoNCkc/OGu WlD8RUp8Q7n/wwnPs1+t7j/pQRGIdVt29DoiyP1Gqkdfqa8ypdqXwLKzV h+ejQYMfqLEtI69HtFTehMv5cegP4eBihs65GN5XWemWyNCSgekUNfTv+ I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,5915"; a="35933885"
Received: from ironstorm.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.153]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2010 15:12:27 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,608,1262592000"; d="scan'208";a="51217536"
Received: from unknown (HELO nasanexhub06.na.qualcomm.com) ([129.46.134.254]) by ironstorm.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 09 Mar 2010 15:12:25 -0800
Received: from nalasexhub02.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.130.89) by nasanexhub06.na.qualcomm.com (129.46.134.254) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:12:05 -0800
Received: from NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.7.114]) by nalasexhub02.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.130.89]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:12:05 -0800
From: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
To: "Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com" <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>, "cjbc@it.uc3m.es" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:12:03 -0800
Thread-Topic: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
Thread-Index: Acq/0G/CoUFvhnU4TDaq3DufgDxlXAAAYDmLAAK7ChA=
Message-ID: <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1C6A8C452B@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <1268170553.3674.38.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <C7BC1DC6.5BFE%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7BC1DC6.5BFE%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:12:24 -0000

Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> On 3/9/10 3:35 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
> wrote:
> 
> > Dear Raj,
> >
> > On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 22:15 +0100, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
> >> Hi Carlos,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/9/10 12:29 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano"
> <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Raj,
> >>>
> >>> I'ld like to ask why there are slots assigned to drafts that do
> address
> >>> any WG charter item, while draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01
> >>> which addresses one of the charter items:
> >>
> >> Which specific slots are you refering to?
> >> A. The radius extensions for PMIP6 is part of the WG after
> rechartering.
> >> This work has been transferred from Netlmm to Netext
> >> B. The localized routing I-D is the baseline from which we work on
> the
> >> solution and LR is within the scope of the charter
> >> C. ITHO is now part of the charter and I have just included Yokota's
> I-D to
> >> initiate the discussion.
> >
> > As far as I understand Yokota's ID is a particular solution (nothing
> > against it), while we are chartered to work on:
> >
> > - Informational applicability statement that analyzes the issues
> > involved with this approach and characterizes the contexts in which
> > such use is or is not appropriate.
> >
> > Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
> > Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
> >
> > This is exactly what our draft tries to discuss, so I think this is
> > also a good draft to trigger the discussion. Once this is clear, we'll
> > have to think on particular solutions (the virtual interface is one of the
> > possible ones).
> 
> Let me revisit the agenda and also take a look at your I-D and see what
> to do. Basically the fancy wording in the milestone refers to the use of a
> virtual interface for supporting ITHO.

No it does not.

> But thanks for keeping the chairs honest :)

The text is the charter is pretty clear, thanks in advance for adhering to it. 

--julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email