Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77

[<[e-mail]>]

Carlos,

I took a look at the I-D: draft-bernardos-netext-ll-statement-01. Thanks for
writing it. We can use this document  to discuss the milestone included in
the WG charter. 

In terms of the applicability section, I was wondering if you had any
analysis on how the various approaches could be considered for specifically
addressing ITHO and flow mobility while factoring in whether a specific
technique would require changes to the host and if so at what layer.

I have updated the agenda (
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/10mar/agenda/netext.txt) which includes the
discussion of this milestone.

Rgds,
-Raj



On 3/9/10 3:59 PM, "ext Zuniga, Juan Carlos"
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Raj,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>> Behalf Of [e-mail]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 09 March, 2010 4:46 PM
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Cc: [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Carlos,
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/9/10 3:35 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Raj,
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 22:15 +0100, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/9/10 12:29 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano"
>> <[e-mail]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Raj,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'ld like to ask why there are slots assigned to drafts that do
>> address
>>>>> any WG charter item, while draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01
>>>>> which addresses one of the charter items:
>>>> 
>>>> Which specific slots are you refering to?
>>>> A. The radius extensions for PMIP6 is part of the WG after
>> rechartering.
>>>> This work has been transferred from Netlmm to Netext
>>>> B. The localized routing I-D is the baseline from which we work on
>> the
>>>> solution and LR is within the scope of the charter
>>>> C. ITHO is now part of the charter and I have just included Yokota's
>> I-D to
>>>> initiate the discussion.
>>> 
>>> As far as I understand Yokota's ID is a particular solution (nothing
>>> against it), while we are chartered to work on:
>>> 
>>> - Informational applicability statement that analyzes the issues
>>> involved with this approach and characterizes the contexts in which
>>> such use is or is not appropriate.
>>> 
>>> Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
>>> Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
>>> 
>>> This is exactly what our draft tries to discuss, so I think this is
>> also
>>> a good draft to trigger the discussion. Once this is clear, we'll
>> have
>>> to think on particular solutions (the virtual interface is one of the
>>> possible ones).
>> 
>> Let me revisit the agenda and also take a look at your I-D and see what
>> to
>> do. Basically the fancy wording in the milestone refers to the use of a
>> virtual interface for supporting ITHO.
> 
> Obviously, your interpretation of the fancy wording is not shared by all
> members of the group.
> 
>> 
>> But thanks for keeping the chairs honest :)
>> 
> 
> No problem. We'll do our best ;)
> 
> Jc
> 
>> 
>> 
>> -Raj
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Carlos
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The I-Ds may be individual at the moment but the work itself is very
>> much
>>>> within WG charter. We will have WG I-Ds (hopefully) on these topics
>> at the
>>>> next meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> -Raj
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
>>>>> Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
>>>>> 
>>>>> is on the "if time permits" list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Carlos
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 19:20 +0100, [e-mail] wrote:
>>>>>> Rev: 01
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Network-Based Mobility Extensions WG meeting
>>>>>> THURSDAY, March 25, 2010
>>>>>> 1300-1500 Afternoon Session I (Redondo)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1. Logistics (Bluesheets, minutes takers, jabber, agenda bashing)
>> 5 mins
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 2. WG status update          Chairs        5 Mins
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 3. Runtime LMA selection I-D update   Jouni Korhonen     10 Mins
>>>>>>    I-D: draft-ietf-netext-redirect-01
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 4. Bulk re-reg I-D update and next steps    Fuad Junior   10 Mins
>>>>>>    I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 5. Radius extensions for PMIP6     Frank Xia       5 Mins
>>>>>>    I-D: draft-xia-netext-radius-00
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 5. Localized routing solution discussion    Suresh K.       20
>> Mins
>>>>>>    I-D: draft-krishnan-netext-pmip-lr-01
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 6. Flow mobility for PMIP6: Solution approaches  Chairs lead
>> discussion
>>>>>>    20 Mins
>>>>>>    We will consider the various I-Ds that have proposed solutions
>> for
>>>>>>    flow mobility. Please send a one slide summary of your I-D and
>>>>>>    solution proposal to : [e-mail]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 7. Inter-tech HO with PMIP6   Hidetoshi Yokota      15 Mins
>>>>>>    I-D:  draft-yokota-netlmm-pmipv6-mn-itho-support-03
>>>>>>    We will also discuss the scope of the inter-technology handover
>>>>>>    work that needs to be undertaken in the WG.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 8. Next steps       Chairs        5 Mins
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Time permitting we will consider the following I-Ds:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (i)  draft-hong-netext-hybrid-hnp-01            Yong-Geun
>>>>>> (ii) draft-jeyatharan-netext-pmip-dormant-binding-v00   M.
>> Jeyatharan
>>>>>> (iii) draft-chan-netext-distributed-lma-03   Anthony Chan
>>>>>> (iv) draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01    Carlos Cano
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> netext mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
>>>>> GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
>>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netext mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext