Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Tue, 09 March 2010 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52C13A69C5 for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:46:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.834
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.834 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.435, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Krfa5BRt6oF8 for <netext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:46:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF5A3A6991 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:46:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o29LkNw8024767; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:46:24 -0600
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.23]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:46:23 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:46:18 +0200
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-03.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.88]) by nok-am1mhub-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.5]) with mapi; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:46:17 +0100
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:46:14 +0100
Thread-Topic: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
Thread-Index: Acq/0G/CoUFvhnU4TDaq3DufgDxlXAAAYDmL
Message-ID: <C7BC1DC6.5BFE%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1268170553.3674.38.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2010 21:46:18.0162 (UTC) FILETIME=[F321A920:01CABFD1]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Draft agenda of WG meeting at IETF77
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:46:22 -0000

Hi Carlos,


On 3/9/10 3:35 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
wrote:

> Dear Raj,
> 
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 22:15 +0100, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
>> Hi Carlos,
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/9/10 12:29 PM, "ext Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Raj,
>>> 
>>> I'ld like to ask why there are slots assigned to drafts that do address
>>> any WG charter item, while draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01
>>> which addresses one of the charter items:
>> 
>> Which specific slots are you refering to?
>> A. The radius extensions for PMIP6 is part of the WG after rechartering.
>> This work has been transferred from Netlmm to Netext
>> B. The localized routing I-D is the baseline from which we work on the
>> solution and LR is within the scope of the charter
>> C. ITHO is now part of the charter and I have just included Yokota's I-D to
>> initiate the discussion.
> 
> As far as I understand Yokota's ID is a particular solution (nothing
> against it), while we are chartered to work on:
> 
> - Informational applicability statement that analyzes the issues
> involved with this approach and characterizes the contexts in which
> such use is or is not appropriate.
> 
> Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
> Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
> 
> This is exactly what our draft tries to discuss, so I think this is also
> a good draft to trigger the discussion. Once this is clear, we'll have
> to think on particular solutions (the virtual interface is one of the
> possible ones).

Let me revisit the agenda and also take a look at your I-D and see what to
do. Basically the fancy wording in the milestone refers to the use of a
virtual interface for supporting ITHO.

But thanks for keeping the chairs honest :)


-Raj



> 
> Carlos
> 
>> 
>> The I-Ds may be individual at the moment but the work itself is very much
>> within WG charter. We will have WG I-Ds (hopefully) on these topics at the
>> next meeting.
>> 
>> -Raj
>> 
>>> 
>>> Jul 2010  Initial WG document on Applicability Statement on Logical
>>> Interface over Multiple Physical Interfaces
>>> 
>>> is on the "if time permits" list.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Carlos
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 19:20 +0100, Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com wrote:
>>>> Rev: 01
>>>> 
>>>> Network-Based Mobility Extensions WG meeting
>>>> THURSDAY, March 25, 2010
>>>> 1300-1500 Afternoon Session I (Redondo)
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Logistics (Bluesheets, minutes takers, jabber, agenda bashing) 5 mins
>>>> 
>>>> 2. WG status update          Chairs        5 Mins
>>>> 
>>>> 3. Runtime LMA selection I-D update   Jouni Korhonen     10 Mins
>>>>    I-D: draft-ietf-netext-redirect-01
>>>> 
>>>> 4. Bulk re-reg I-D update and next steps    Fuad Junior   10 Mins
>>>>    I-D: draft-ietf-netext-bulk-re-registration-00
>>>> 
>>>> 5. Radius extensions for PMIP6     Frank Xia       5 Mins
>>>>    I-D: draft-xia-netext-radius-00
>>>> 
>>>> 5. Localized routing solution discussion    Suresh K.       20 Mins
>>>>    I-D: draft-krishnan-netext-pmip-lr-01
>>>> 
>>>> 6. Flow mobility for PMIP6: Solution approaches  Chairs lead discussion
>>>>    20 Mins
>>>>    We will consider the various I-Ds that have proposed solutions for
>>>>    flow mobility. Please send a one slide summary of your I-D and
>>>>    solution proposal to : netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org
>>>> 
>>>> 7. Inter-tech HO with PMIP6   Hidetoshi Yokota      15 Mins
>>>>    I-D:  draft-yokota-netlmm-pmipv6-mn-itho-support-03
>>>>    We will also discuss the scope of the inter-technology handover
>>>>    work that needs to be undertaken in the WG.
>>>> 
>>>> 8. Next steps       Chairs        5 Mins
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> Time permitting we will consider the following I-Ds:
>>>> 
>>>> (i)  draft-hong-netext-hybrid-hnp-01            Yong-Geun
>>>> (ii) draft-jeyatharan-netext-pmip-dormant-binding-v00   M. Jeyatharan
>>>> (iii) draft-chan-netext-distributed-lma-03   Anthony Chan
>>>> (iv) draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-nemo-ps-01    Carlos Cano
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> netext mailing list
>>>> netext@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano     http://www.netcoms.net
>>> GPG FP: D29B 0A6A 639A A561 93CA  4D55 35DC BA4D D170 4F67
>>