[netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text
Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Tue, 22 August 2017 19:53 UTC
Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF6613218E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2phUMq3OsNqd for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0258132494 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 12:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=MZJSzfpXecIFfbeCkaao45iSk/3E8Jk1cGcP5qkW+Tw=; b=P2P8mJ4bwFUHpOVgEcv9WzlN21VkT9XI1hFE5gS6Vg/CD2mMOtnDe5gtvmUe9n5ShA8gxMO5xuJxiD4LDnjP6iDn4n2RZ5GYKKYBfsvmRTAU/BwbABfV0wA5kzO9/sXnVA8Sa6n9dQTAvHNfUGYNm3avX3yz0mgxXeuKNc57oP8=
Received: from CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.149.11) by CY1PR0501MB1307.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.226.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.1385.4; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:53:46 +0000
Received: from CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.149.11]) by CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.149.11]) with mapi id 15.01.1385.008; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:53:46 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text
Thread-Index: AQHTG4BdACYCFz8ZdEeedIP50UiUzw==
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:53:46 +0000
Message-ID: <4425D564-7AD1-40B7-853F-FA9328E10F2D@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0501MB1307; 6:c81rvG0mxjVUJ639YxA9hXBf9StU5bs1tS5ZJK1kW8RQTmbafFYk8Fti8xScuPbR6ki5Vy0wEA4ad294qwbBpc2cQL40Gd6hzqLvsgKXsPUJqnox3lfSiOTilM38KLL/3fOwQuhdol80EFpKOdIsJDqNL7vozLvllAVfwFjQQnjjbJbS4EqwJxRBcj6P6Q4vrPSZR8jzhL7qpluG9Eby2ukkaG7yMG2iMJTS2On4Mm7bkOkrBjnSHCLwJMRUcFSY2EA96USO0XPxdVKJs1Nfzpi57lS0dVArsgXO5IghohVbfFkrRG+b8te4Aa5F1uN27oBBxcQEguT4RpXdPlRQXA==; 5:sYLANhBf/8V/N5hHhAjy2/B+KAGowj7nhGz3jrvsYicLdsoxog8SMMHVtHPQo2N8bzvuM//PlA9eU7bBLm/7pMmu7S+zkzbcKde6nEnUFsYcMJMfc8UIcAB9Av5DRH7HUdQF96DYVvXgkKd7qe/NeA==; 24:0sTZXIz3q846WlYSRTVy6blO6i23Re86EXyDOGO65ecsEfgMnlYBNJ/tP217FJ3A44eIEkWTv7VRwvMGRMGBq+Nve5q2CSjEr7HueSHn9Dw=; 7:fKssg4KReD2LxqENaiLMCR7Z5yeh6icDNPUVrYDbyXR0ZUWNEpYuGe50yVmyjVeIyQzTjhTez1O1Qg2+oHmqvZrSXYr1MMim7c6LnqtEAt7xz4IdOI1yeFv6QTRGIBRVNOvX8Q91O+jmfeqzNSgm9nJG6ltDM6LMYNGViCJG+85UPk3QMM6Pyha4BRZnZXmMdAAyEikTuot04qksz3IwH/yNqpJKLiKCvzf2fNWZ2rg=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1aac2258-264f-4109-969e-08d4e9978054
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(300000503095)(300135400095)(48565401081)(2017052603031)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1307;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY1PR0501MB1307:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR0501MB1307D218FFC2CD1A855FA125A5840@CY1PR0501MB1307.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123558100)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1307; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1307;
x-forefront-prvs: 04073E895A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39860400002)(189002)(199003)(81166006)(8676002)(14454004)(33656002)(77096006)(1730700003)(106356001)(36756003)(478600001)(81156014)(101416001)(105586002)(8936002)(5640700003)(2351001)(82746002)(6916009)(5660300001)(6506006)(110136004)(3280700002)(189998001)(53936002)(66066001)(2900100001)(99286003)(68736007)(6512007)(4001350100001)(3660700001)(86362001)(6116002)(2501003)(97736004)(83716003)(25786009)(3846002)(102836003)(7736002)(83506001)(2906002)(54356999)(6436002)(305945005)(50986999)(6486002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0501MB1307; H:CY1PR0501MB1450.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <45DC6138C4568344BF4ED66A053966A3@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Aug 2017 19:53:46.7505 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0501MB1307
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/QwejU9ld7Cl9NGRk8m9i_PB4aoA>
Subject: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 19:53:50 -0000
Hi, During the meeting in Chicago, the NMDA authors took an action to propose some text for S4.23. After a little review, the following emerged. Yes, it's short, but was anything left anything out? =====START===== 4.23 Operational Data Operational data includes both config "false" nodes as well as, on servers supporting <operational> [draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores], the applied value of config "true" nodes. YANG modules SHOULD be designed assuming they will be used on servers supporting <operational>. With this in mind, YANG modules SHOULD define config "false" wherever they make sense to the data model. Config "false" nodes SHOULD NOT be defined to provide the operational value for configuration nodes, except when the value space of a configured and operational values may differ, in which case a distinct config "false" node SHOULD be defined to hold the operational value for the configured node. =====STOP===== One question that came up is if "operational data" is a well-defined term. This string appears 10 times in rfc6087bis. Most interestingly, appendix Section A.8. (v05 to v06) includes this line item: Changed term "operational state" to "operational data" So it seems to be deliberate... Kent // contributor
- [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text Kent Watsen