Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Mon, 28 August 2017 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEB413291C for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aiuLytk3elkw for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C36B1321C7 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id u26so9118109wma.0 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NnoQTwQ+z1Ygl5QA6HHrKblb3Nr0dbdB6O8zlLgORug=; b=kyDHmSfH0ER63gsOhyrVvWHF+76HB0hnFc6YWqSUw9t/qoqnkrwKGDt2B1XqtWJQJy lV1kvzN3AEPMk8V3ELi2Fb/3O/Oar1KTle3NGtAFyku9wWHk/HmSvmYZSSNWYB7zr3MR FCCOWquoeR72uv6Yv8hEguhv6JOdaoiMES9Zz37yzAxeh+2o8WtCZEkVvdEwlPGz/2Fs zximc00ayGCNRVd2QBKDm5NnfqMsH+YmpzQSwOQbrhfvOx4ZN2nH+iBUwSyd8+c+0DLL wqJ4vpDR2Xgyl5puvRy+6vlGfvhXr5bsTNGrLbJ7BawATCsmVuSwOpSNt8m+0l8sAZO3 A0NQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NnoQTwQ+z1Ygl5QA6HHrKblb3Nr0dbdB6O8zlLgORug=; b=fYtr9KHav8hmc5EWE1YcZmeYB78NI2VHl24vXApQ+c5RNvdj94WcOFlwqCFyUmBhrH 5e6A7QWVeWZ9l+/Dhoab2i/l/S3FN2XIggWE0mmyuqbM5otCvcq1a0WIn5Q7a3ovLSwT C/WoyOeDQik7DTXMoYNJ5Fid0ZEpL5G6wSjbkheuPnopwJfgbDSVYd2N7RiWS7Fnayd/ X4ns6lNL1W1NpXrKKt9Jh76h4fhLsZqgt9srjGRuzx6CZ08clm+O+Om6hpUWGuYKWyfW QejviA97knKGam+AxItb+iT1T3k8GayIh1sDGTxhz+yIRk78cd6BNmr3Vfac3Wy0lvWk zOWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5ipYymfTgdH8sTFtGxUFKp9DLX0Y1tcQGmr5+uEbHeSwSXsH/X5 OPnWoMVu5dt0QRBxDdDFmlXPnfPUkplf
X-Received: by 10.28.159.141 with SMTP id i135mr861004wme.153.1503946450005; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.164.221 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <75d35cde-644b-31ac-e784-516cfc8162a1@labn.net>
References: <4425D564-7AD1-40B7-853F-FA9328E10F2D@juniper.net> <9596582d-17cf-e851-f88f-fd7a79d88e4f@labn.net> <20170823061709.prezywubi7b32w7i@elstar.local> <FF29E43D-CC6F-4B8F-BE2D-5A87E5967714@juniper.net> <CABCOCHRQ+B6h1sZmOff9+fWSaoPgJ7ZBF1wPcG_C7zrH7=zZ0g@mail.gmail.com> <AD1D598E-92EF-49F2-AE2A-048EE9746E12@juniper.net> <CABCOCHSBvr9rtFDRFZjZdVFbQbB7nB3dz5Xu7C4ctwA=hR+auA@mail.gmail.com> <CABCOCHTw-6YFy5jQ3dT5bymTeeR69vFz-jtVdrGW=HBr=tJyiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170828101111.bedfkeoxw3xcj4ex@elstar.local> <CABCOCHSypnnHUqcjGPa5v3Q=yQhnV2Ks9urutBEjnaaL8KYodg@mail.gmail.com> <75d35cde-644b-31ac-e784-516cfc8162a1@labn.net>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:54:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQWANaBEpFVsh+U2vcw-sSFsXttonGLOebDP-_=10MDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144e7f6ea119e0557d4d1db"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ydq6vyCTQWe9imiFyNv1C5cgWZ4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:54:13 -0000

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
>
>
> On 8/28/2017 12:24 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > 4.23.1.  Combining Operational State and Configuration Data
> > >
> > >    If possible, operational state SHOULD be combined with its
> associated
> > >    configuration data.  This prevents duplication of key leafs and
> > >    ancestor nodes.  It also prevents race conditions for retrieval of
> > >    dynamic entries, and allows configuration and operational state to
> be
> > >    retrieved together with minimal message overhead.
> > >
> I find the inclusion of the non NMDA form in this section a bit
> confusing, do you have any objection to dropping the following?
>
> > >    Not NMDA-Compliant:
> > >
> > >       container foo {
> > >         ...
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       container foo-state {
> > >         config false;
> > >         ...
> > >       }
> > >
>
>
removed



> Thanks,
> Lou
>
>