IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 28 August 2017 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A294A132143 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kFoABCDiV8n for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAC8E132925 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw4 (unknown [10.0.90.85]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED0A1E07E3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:58:57 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id 2iyt1w00J2SSUrH01iywy1; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:58:57 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=G8xsK5s5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=KeKAF7QvOSUA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=6f13sgRxtjv3C5GwbYEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Yz9wTY_ffGCQnEDHKrcv:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3xNiM1UenmZ1tjvr1L5jLEu0MuDW12Cc/4PQ/NDL8rM=; b=UMDJz/mDklNjlzwsHyAP/xI+n6 LVQtCynmBYIdorMWZdeI+npSiQ78eed9R/+jPqPyTBBc9Mfwck/7XZVwZ/ro+00HRQLk6qVF4Brjq 8GdGIpX81JnAydUmWjhTax4NC;
Received: from pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.84.20]:52684 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1dmPFN-000vDK-NB; Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:58:53 -0600
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Cc: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <4425D564-7AD1-40B7-853F-FA9328E10F2D@juniper.net> <9596582d-17cf-e851-f88f-fd7a79d88e4f@labn.net> <20170823061709.prezywubi7b32w7i@elstar.local> <FF29E43D-CC6F-4B8F-BE2D-5A87E5967714@juniper.net> <CABCOCHRQ+B6h1sZmOff9+fWSaoPgJ7ZBF1wPcG_C7zrH7=zZ0g@mail.gmail.com> <AD1D598E-92EF-49F2-AE2A-048EE9746E12@juniper.net> <CABCOCHSBvr9rtFDRFZjZdVFbQbB7nB3dz5Xu7C4ctwA=hR+auA@mail.gmail.com> <CABCOCHTw-6YFy5jQ3dT5bymTeeR69vFz-jtVdrGW=HBr=tJyiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170828101111.bedfkeoxw3xcj4ex@elstar.local> <CABCOCHSypnnHUqcjGPa5v3Q=yQhnV2Ks9urutBEjnaaL8KYodg@mail.gmail.com> <75d35cde-644b-31ac-e784-516cfc8162a1@labn.net> <CABCOCHQWANaBEpFVsh+U2vcw-sSFsXttonGLOebDP-_=10MDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <0e4ad497-93d7-3f8f-209c-b4505de77d96@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 14:58:48 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHQWANaBEpFVsh+U2vcw-sSFsXttonGLOebDP-_=10MDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.84.20
X-Exim-ID: 1dmPFN-000vDK-NB
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-84-20.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.84.20]:52684
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 12
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/vrEp5P9Hvdp-yUygFvAiSGrU_gc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6087bis S4.23 replacement text
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:59:00 -0000

Thanks!


On 8/28/2017 2:54 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net
> <mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Andy,
>
>
>     On 8/28/2017 12:24 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
>     > > 4.23.1.  Combining Operational State and Configuration Data
>     > >
>     > >    If possible, operational state SHOULD be combined with its
>     associated
>     > >    configuration data.  This prevents duplication of key leafs and
>     > >    ancestor nodes.  It also prevents race conditions for
>     retrieval of
>     > >    dynamic entries, and allows configuration and operational
>     state to be
>     > >    retrieved together with minimal message overhead.
>     > >
>     I find the inclusion of the non NMDA form in this section a bit
>     confusing, do you have any objection to dropping the following?
>
>     > >    Not NMDA-Compliant:
>     > >
>     > >       container foo {
>     > >         ...
>     > >       }
>     > >
>     > >       container foo-state {
>     > >         config false;
>     > >         ...
>     > >       }
>     > >
>
>
> removed
>
>  
>
>     Thanks,
>     Lou
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email