IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [NGO] external module properties

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 29 April 2008 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ngo-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ngo-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ngo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5373A6D91; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:37:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00303A6D8A for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.504, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jk-l1IyUq5PZ for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wes.hardakers.net (dcn236-43.dcn.davis.ca.us [168.150.236.43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CA03A6DC6 for <ngo@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wes.hardakers.net (wlap.dyn.hardakers.net [127.0.0.1]) by wes.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CCD399A86; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=hardakers.net; h=received:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; q=dns/txt; s=wesmail; bh=wHBvBGJ+7f0Jfrdj08Sr9oF6Ag4=; b=JFYjLzGQs60IHpgq+O0CuN7Y+oqUhYfuAS/61xMWUjMoDyW0IjFUto+ZHSnByJVnz2vHGL+dHXnuhTdylYvB9OOPy1bqkRPDHLYtxBvETzJQLxL4rVc4HIERzeo4wYS3Y0QD2YSsIW6tl0k+FNsX3w+sffSp4dURblmLvZr6SGE=
Received: by wes.hardakers.net (Postfix, from userid 274) id DE2E7399B9B; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
Organization: Sparta
References: <200804291854.m3TIsHsL089922@idle.juniper.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:36:15 -0700
In-Reply-To: <200804291854.m3TIsHsL089922@idle.juniper.net> (Phil Shafer's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:54:17 -0400")
Message-ID: <sdk5igsbbk.fsf@wes.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux, no MULE)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: 'NETCONF Goes On' <ngo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NGO] external module properties
X-BeenThere: ngo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF Goes On - discussions on future work and extensions to NETCONF <ngo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ngo>
List-Post: <mailto:ngo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ngo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ngo-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:54:17 -0400, Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> said:

PS> But from a real-world point of view, a company making multiple
PS> security fixes in one day won't last long enough to worry about.

Or the one time that a big company does and realizes it's mistake and
immediately tries to do the right thing will get equally as hurt.

PS> The marketplace will solve the problem on its own.

So you should take no objection to doing a more granular release number format.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email