Re: [NGO] external module properties

Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net> Tue, 29 April 2008 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ngo-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ngo-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ngo-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF053A6D56; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ngo@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3AA3A6939 for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LYH4IdPjxIUJ for <ngo@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABA33A6D4F for <ngo@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:13:44 PDT
Received: from magenta.juniper.net ([172.17.27.123]) by emailsmtp55.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:13:07 -0700
Received: from idle.juniper.net (idleski.juniper.net [172.25.4.26]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id m3TGD7x49354; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:13:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phil@juniper.net)
Received: from idle.juniper.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idle.juniper.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3TGBTHr088389; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:11:30 GMT (envelope-from phil@idle.juniper.net)
Message-Id: <200804291611.m3TGBTHr088389@idle.juniper.net>
To: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
In-reply-to: <481742EF.5030607@andybierman.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:11:29 -0400
From: Phil Shafer <phil@juniper.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2008 16:13:07.0947 (UTC) FILETIME=[E98CABB0:01C8AA13]
Cc: 'NETCONF Goes On' <ngo@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [NGO] external module properties
X-BeenThere: ngo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF Goes On - discussions on future work and extensions to NETCONF <ngo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ngo>
List-Post: <mailto:ngo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ngo-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ngo-bounces@ietf.org

Andy Bierman writes:
>The standard uses 'stock fuzzy text' to warn vendors
>to pick module names that will not clash.  This is how the IETF
>punts the problem, because the real solution involves a registry,
>and we apparently already have enough of those.  Vendors would
>not want to register their module names with IANA anyway.

The other option is the one java took: use reversed domain name
hierarchies to ensure that there are no conflicts.  No one but sun
can make a com.sun.java.swing module, given you instant self-organizing
uniqueness.  If you own the domain, you own the namespace under
that domain.  Pro: simple; con: verbose.

Thanks,
 Phil
_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo