IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-suggest-refid-00

Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org> Thu, 07 April 2016 08:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20A912D604 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4UpWYNfFKMc for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D48E12D5FF for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AF786DC71 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:55:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from stenn.ntp.org (stenn.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::30]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7BA86DBDB for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:55:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [::1] (helo=stenn.ntp.org) by stenn.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <stenn@stenn.ntp.org>) id 1ao5fz-0005GE-Mx; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:52:31 +0000
From: Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>
To: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-reply-to: <20160407083221.1F3B2406074@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
References: <20160407083221.1F3B2406074@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> message dated "Thu, 07 Apr 2016 01:32:21 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.6; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 24)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8)
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:52:31 +0000
Message-Id: <E1ao5fz-0005GE-Mx@stenn.ntp.org>
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-suggest-refid-00
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, tictoc@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

Hal Murray writes:
> > How did you get from a mode 6 query to a log file?
> 
> You said I could get the real refid via mode 6,

No, I said you could get the address of the upstream peer with mode 6.

> The context I was thinking about was forensics.  I'm often interested
> in what has happened rather than what is happening.  In that case, all
> the evidence that is available is what's in the log files.

That may be OK with IPv4 refids, but how do the current logfiles help
you with IPv6-based refids?

H
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email