Re: [ntpwg] Fwd: Early Allocations for NTS drafts from the IETF NTP Working Group

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Tue, 15 March 2016 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3AC12D673 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wCT8rr0L0Hlt for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AD112D66B for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:04:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD12286DBDD for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:04:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E78A86DABE for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:04:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail230c25.carrierzone.com ([64.29.147.244] helo=mail237c25-2586.carrierzone.com) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>) id 1aftKJ-0003cw-Uy; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:04:25 +0000
X-POP-User: hmurray@megapathdsl.net
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by mail237c25-2586.carrierzone.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u2FI45og014345; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:04:08 +0000
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EFB406057; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org> of "Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:31:55 -0000." <E1afmGZ-0000FO-6A@stenn.ntp.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:04:03 -0700
Message-Id: <20160315180403.30EFB406057@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
X-CSC: 0
X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=TZev63gh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OWgXOY7Tc8w5m7k7nGX6Zw==:117 a=OWgXOY7Tc8w5m7k7nGX6Zw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=7OsogOcEt9IA:10 a=85N1-lAfAAAA:8 a=Ml9mYWmxSj7ZUBLEGvEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010201.56E84E9B.0092, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules:
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.29.147.244
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: stenn@ntp.org, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hmurray@megapathdsl.net
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] Fwd: Early Allocations for NTS drafts from the IETF NTP Working Group
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, hmurray@megapathdsl.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

stenn@ntp.org said:
>> No, you can't. There is no secret that could be used to create a
>> proper MAC yet.
> Yes we can,  with a symmetric key. 

If you have a symmetric key you don't need NTS.

It may be that the right approach is to dump NTS and use shared keys.  If so, 
we should be working on ways to distribute shared keys out of band from NTP 
proper.

Is there any reason to tightly couple distributing keys with NTP?


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg