IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-suggest-refid-00

Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Thu, 07 April 2016 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C5112D5CA for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmC0BKHW5Y2D for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AC912D58F for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1BA86DC5D for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:37:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629A786DBDC for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:32:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail230c25.carrierzone.com ([64.29.147.244] helo=mail237c25-2586.carrierzone.com) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>) id 1ao5MX-000OK9-2h; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:32:47 +0000
X-POP-User: hmurray@megapathdsl.net
Received: from ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net [64.139.1.69]) by mail237c25-2586.carrierzone.com (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u378WLlc011852; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:32:22 +0000
Received: from shuksan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3B2406074; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>
From: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>
In-Reply-To: Message from Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org> of "Thu, 07 Apr 2016 06:35:30 -0000." <E1ao3XO-00057A-Rw@stenn.ntp.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 01:32:21 -0700
Message-Id: <20160407083221.1F3B2406074@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net>
X-CSC: 0
X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=EYLxHpWC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OWgXOY7Tc8w5m7k7nGX6Zw==:117 a=OWgXOY7Tc8w5m7k7nGX6Zw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=kziv93cY1bsA:10 a=jVlkoXtc9V915UhSPW4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lbFWo1bU1VEA:10
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010204.57061B17.003E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-Score: 0.000
X-CTCH-Rules:
X-CTCH-Flags: 0
X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.29.147.244
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: stenn@ntp.org, ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hmurray@megapathdsl.net
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [TICTOC] comments on draft-stenn-ntp-suggest-refid-00
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, tictoc@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

> How did you get from a mode 6 query to a log file?

You said I could get the real refid via mode 6,
  
The context I was thinking about was forensics.  I'm often interested in what 
has happened rather than what is happening.  In that case, all the evidence 
that is available is what's in the log files.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email