Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 17 February 2012 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9410F21F86E4 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:21:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QLbPhk5xW1fk for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227B621E8041 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 32532 invoked by uid 399); 17 Feb 2012 17:21:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.57?) (pbs:robert@raszuk.net@83.28.249.110) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTPM; 17 Feb 2012 17:21:32 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 83.28.249.110
Message-ID: <4F3E8C9C.8070705@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:21:32 +0100
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "david.black@emc.com" <david.black@emc.com>
References: <201202171451.q1HEptR3027370@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>, <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C70661A@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <5E613872-0E27-46D2-8097-B31E7F0F37C5@mimectl>, <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C70669D@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <B56CFB4A-2393-42C7-9A89-0AA397512F12@mimectl> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C9148ED@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C9148ED@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "narten@us.ibm.com" <narten@us.ibm.com>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, Adrian Farrel <afarrel@juniper.net>, Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:21:40 -0000

> I suggest reading the NVGRE and VXLAN drafts for more context:
>>
>>      http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sridharan-virtualization-nvgre-00

Actually to be fare on this one I have to agree with John.

10 authors and 16 pages to define a GRE key is an amazing achievement.

Especially since GRE header with MPLS label behind it is used 
effectively for many years now to achieve the same level of 
virtualization in number of shipping applications.

Reference: RFC4023

Regards,
R.