IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Fri, 17 February 2012 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1890521E8093 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:05:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gvyKjS7Ye75o for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49C821E803C for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:05:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTz6Iv4Z4rt+e8mdB6Px3C9z2t4b7DTIh@postini.com; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:05:11 PST
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:02:10 -0800
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: "robert@raszuk.net" <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:02:06 -0800
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter
Thread-Index: AcztlCKBcpqVQvy3ScqQMWW8tRc15AAAa0xQ
Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C9148D8@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <201202171451.q1HEptR3027370@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>, <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C70661A@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <5E613872-0E27-46D2-8097-B31E7F0F37C5@mimectl> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A55C70669D@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <4F3E851F.6060604@raszuk.net>
In-Reply-To: <4F3E851F.6060604@raszuk.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-exclaimer-md-config: e4081efb-6d29-443c-8708-750833aec629
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "narten@us.ibm.com" <narten@us.ibm.com>, Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, "david.black@emc.com" <david.black@emc.com>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, Adrian Farrel <afarrel@juniper.net>, Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:05:12 -0000

Robert,

As an example, please see: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-marques-l3vpn-end-system/

Thanks,

John  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Raszuk [mailto:robert@raszuk.net]
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:50 AM
> To: John E Drake
> Cc: david.black@emc.com; narten@us.ibm.com; nvo3@ietf.org; Ronald
> Bonica; Nitin Bahadur; Adrian Farrel
> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> > [JD]  This is an assertion.  It is also the misses the fact that MPLS
> > is only required to mux/demux packets at the edges of the VPN
> > network.
> 
> Let me observe that at least in some data centers the "edge of VPN" is
> likely to be the hypervisor (with OVS) on the host machine. The reason
> being that VMs residing on such host may belong to different customers.
> 
> Could you describe how existing technologies would work in such case ?
> Are you proposing to turn each host to be a PE ? Or are you worried
> that
> host has not sufficient forwarding power to act as PE so one would need
> a dedicated hardware to be a PE ?
> 
> Best regards,
> R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email