IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 17 February 2012 23:43 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0AA21F8548 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:43:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.38
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.219, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WGFoKGbJC0k for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:43:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81C221F8546 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:43:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 2786 invoked by uid 399); 17 Feb 2012 23:43:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.57?) (pbs:robert@raszuk.net@83.28.249.110) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTPM; 17 Feb 2012 23:43:23 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 83.28.249.110
Message-ID: <4F3EE61C.8050102@raszuk.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:43:24 +0100
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Igor Gashinsky <igor@yahoo-inc.com>
References: <201202171451.q1HEptR3027370@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <alpine.LRH.2.00.1202171525030.16944@netops1.corp.bf1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1202171525030.16944@netops1.corp.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Draft NVO3 WG Charter
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:43:24 -0000

Hi Igor,

While I agree that we should focus on L3 for transport I guess QinQ has 
some applicability for both traditional networks as well as OF based. I 
would keep it in the charter.

Best,
R.

> I think this is a great charter, but, do we really need to bother with L2
> over L2 type of overlays here? Does anybody actually plan on building
> something like that?
>
> -igor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email